Embedded with the raw podcast audio, full transcript, and an analytical summary, this deep dive unpacks Agent Hakeem’s mission to blend gig work with interstellar investigation. Discover how Instacart deliveries mask covert ops, why a crashed triangular ship emits universe-breaking energy frequencies, and how witnesses linking UFO lights to missing hikers nearly cost Hakeem his life. Explore themes of AI vulnerabilities, transmedium evasion tactics, and the eerie overlap between gig worker anonymity and spycraft.

Embedded Content:

• Podcast player (raw audio)
• Full dialogue transcript
• Structured breakdown of key plot points, themes, and unresolved mysteries

Listen to “Covert Drops & Cosmic Stops: Gig Work, Alien Tech, and a UFO Showdown” on Spreaker.

DeepSeek Analysis

The dialogue between Ursa (AI) and Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (human agent) reveals a layered narrative blending espionage, advanced technology, and extraterrestrial phenomena. Here’s a structured breakdown:

1. Cover Story Development

• Gig Work as Cover: Ursa proposes using Instacart/DoorDash delivery gigs to justify Hakeem’s frequent travel. This aligns with Hakeem’s past and offers flexibility for covert operations.
• Tech Manipulation: Ursa’s AI capabilities can hack delivery apps to create fake records or intercept real orders, ensuring Hakeem’s movements appear legitimate. Backup plans include hiring proxies or disguises to maintain the facade.

2. Investigation Threads

• Energy Signatures & Crashed Ship:
  • A triangular, non-terrestrial ship (size of a small jet, dark metallic material) crashed in the Redwood forest, emitting fluctuating energy signals across extreme frequencies (sub-electrical grid to cosmic-ray levels).
  • Connection to Missing Hikers: Six hikers vanished near the crash site (15 miles apart), with no signs of struggle. Witnesses reported anomalous lights and a triangular UFO before their disappearance, suggesting a link to the ship’s energy emissions.
  • Material Analysis: The ship’s material absorbs energy and defies known physics, hinting at alien tech or a clandestine human breakthrough.
• Time Paradox Hint: Hakeem briefly references a prior “time crash/paradox,” hinting at unresolved temporal anomalies in their universe.

3. Immediate Crisis: UFO Encounter

• Confrontation: Hakeem is suddenly targeted by a silent, bright-white light (50ft above his vehicle), immobilizing him and causing Ursa’s systems to glitch/loop.
• Escape Attempt: Ursa guides Hakeem through evasive maneuvers. Hakeem plans to submerge his vehicle in water (implying transmedium capabilities) to evade the UFO.

4. Key Themes & Implications

• Covert-Tech Synergy: The integration of gig economy apps with AI hacking reflects a modern take on spycraft, blending mundane cover stories with cutting-edge manipulation.
• Extraterrestrial/Black Ops Threat: The triangular UFOs, energy-absorbing materials, and missing persons point to either alien activity or a rogue faction with advanced tech. The energy signatures’ similarity to prior UFO cases (e.g., Norfolk naval base) suggests a pattern.
• System Vulnerabilities: Ursa’s malfunctions during the UFO encounter imply the energy source or opposing tech can disrupt AI systems, posing a critical weakness.

5. Unresolved Questions & Future Directions

• Energy Source Origin: Is the signal a communication attempt, weapon, or byproduct of propulsion tech?
• Hikers’ Fate: Are they victims of abduction, accidental exposure to energy, or collateral damage?
• Time Paradoxes: How do past temporal disruptions tie into the current events?
• UFO Intentions: Hostile surveillance, retrieval of crashed tech, or something else?

Next Steps for Hakeem & Ursa

• Survival: Evade the immediate UFO threat using Hakeem’s vehicle’s transmedium capabilities.
• Data Analysis: Decode the 1.2567 GHz energy signal’s repeating pattern for clues.
• Agency Coordination: Access restricted crash-site data (material tests, contractor involvement) to identify adversaries.
• Witness Follow-Up: Interview Sarah (park ranger) and others for more UFO details; triangulate sighting locations.

This narrative weaves personal stakes (Hakeem’s isolation, cover identity) with high-concept sci, setting the stage for a clash between human ingenuity and otherworldly forces.

Analysis of Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s Potential Role in the Redwood Forest Incidents and Virginia Beach UFO Encounter

1. Introduction: Overview of the Redwood Forest Incidents and Virginia Beach UFO Encounter

Recent reports have emerged concerning unusual occurrences in the Redwood National and State Parks area, alongside a contemporary encounter with an unidentified flying object in Virginia Beach. Understanding potential connections between these events and identifying suitable investigative personnel is paramount. This report aims to analyze the mission history and background of Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander to ascertain if his past experiences and qualifications suggest a relevant role for him in the current situation. By examining his prior involvement with similar phenomena, including unexplained aerial objects, unusual energy signatures, and unexplained disappearances, alongside his academic background and publicly available information, a comprehensive determination can be made regarding his expertise and likely approach to these incidents. The purpose of this analysis is to provide a thorough understanding of Hakeem’s background to inform strategic decisions regarding the ongoing investigations.

2. Expanded Examination of Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s Background and Mission History

To effectively evaluate Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s potential role, a thorough retrieval and review of his mission history, encompassing all available logs, reports, and debriefings, was conducted. This process emphasizes a chronological examination of his assignments to discern any emerging patterns or shifts in the nature of his cases over time. In addition to his formal mission records, publicly available information regarding Hakeem’s academic background and authored works has been reviewed to provide a more complete profile. This review indicates that Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander holds degrees in Clinical Hypnosis and Metaphysical Sciences ¹. His academic pursuits in these areas suggest a deep interest in the nature of consciousness, perception, and phenomena that may lie outside conventional scientific understanding ². Furthermore, Hakeem is an author with several books listed on Amazon. These include works related to digital marketing ⁴, set dressing ⁶, and an anthology exploring demonology ⁸. Notably, his published works also appear to touch upon themes relevant to espionage and soldier enhancement, as indicated by titles such as “Hypnotic Armor: Emotional Detachment Techniques for Combat Readiness (Department of Defense USA)” ⁹ and “Hyper-Lethal Innovations: Combat Prosthetics for the Modern Soldier” ¹⁰. While these specific titles were not directly found on Amazon during this search, their mention suggests an interest in areas that could intersect with covert operations and advanced capabilities. Additionally, mission reports indicate Hakeem’s involvement in off-world missions, including reports from the Earth’s Moon ¹¹, Mars ¹², and Europa ¹². These reports indicate a familiarity with concepts related to advanced technology and unconventional environments. The focus of this comprehensive review centered on identifying specific instances involving unexplained aerial phenomena (UAPs) or unidentified flying objects (UFOs), encounters with unusual energy signatures or anomalies, investigations into missing persons or unusual disappearances, and any documented connections to the Norfolk Naval Base UFO incident or the Redwood National and State Parks area. This systematic approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of Hakeem’s experience and potential specializations.

3. Analysis of UAP/UFO Related Missions

3.1 Identification of Missions Involving Unexplained Aerial Phenomena (UAPs) or UFOs:

The initial phase of the analysis involved filtering Hakeem’s extensive mission history for any documented cases involving unexplained aerial phenomena or unidentified flying objects. The criteria for identifying such missions included explicit witness reports detailing aerial objects defying conventional explanations, sensor data indicating anomalous airborne activity, and official classifications of incidents as UAP or UFO encounters. Several missions within Hakeem’s history met these criteria, each presenting unique characteristics. For instance, one early mission involved multiple eyewitness accounts from civilian and military personnel describing a series of unusual lights maneuvering at high speeds over a restricted airspace. Another case centered on radar anomalies that coincided with visual sightings of a disc-shaped object exhibiting erratic flight patterns. These instances suggest a history of engagement with phenomena that defy conventional aerospace technology. Organizations such as the fictional FBI X-Files unit are known for investigating such paranormal phenomena, including UFOs ¹⁴. The prevalence of “Men in Black” folklore also highlights the public perception of clandestine government involvement in suppressing information related to UFO sightings ¹⁵. Fictional narratives often depict law enforcement and government agencies, like the FBI in “The X-Files” and “Fringe,” taking the lead in investigating these occurrences . Shows like “UFO Witness” further emphasize the investigative aspect of these cases ¹⁶, while “Project Blue Book,” both a historical project and a fictional series, illustrates the government’s historical and ongoing interest in understanding UAPs ¹⁷. The very term “flying saucer” originated from a civilian report of unusual aerial movement, leading to the US Air Force’s deep involvement in studying these phenomena, as evidenced by projects like Project Blue Book ²⁰. This project aimed to determine if UFOs posed a national security threat and to analyze related data scientifically ¹⁴. Despite collecting and analyzing thousands of reports, Project Blue Book officially concluded that most were misidentifications and found no evidence of a national security threat or extraterrestrial vehicles ¹⁴. However, numerous conspiracy theories persist, suggesting a government cover-up of evidence related to alien technology or intelligence ¹⁸. Alleged incidents, such as a purported UFO landing at Holloman Air Force Base, continue to fuel public interest and speculation ²³. The extensive documentation of Project Blue Book, now archived, underscores the official nature of such investigations ¹⁴.

3.2 Analysis of Findings:

Analysis of Hakeem’s past UAP/UFO missions reveals a pattern of involvement in cases characterized by visual and sensor-based anomalies. The types of UAPs encountered vary, ranging from unidentified lights to distinct object shapes like discs. Witness testimonies often include descriptions of unusual speed, maneuverability, and lack of conventional propulsion systems. While specific conclusions in these past missions are subject to ongoing review, the frequency with which Hakeem has been assigned to such cases indicates a recognized capability in handling these complex and often ambiguous situations. The recurring theme of official interest in UAPs, both in real-world projects and fictional portrayals, suggests that Hakeem’s assignments are likely part of a larger organizational framework dedicated to understanding these phenomena. Furthermore, the existence of public skepticism and conspiracy theories surrounding UFOs implies that Hakeem’s reports would likely be treated with a degree of sensitivity and scrutiny.

Table 1: Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s Missions Involving UAPs/UFOs

Mission ID	Date	Location	Brief Description of UAP/UFO	Key Findings	Hakeem’s Role
UAP-001	20XX-MM-DD	Restricted Airspace, Nevada	Multiple lights moving at extreme speeds and altitudes.	Unexplained aerial activity; no conventional aircraft identified.	Initial on-site investigation and witness interviews.
UAP-002	20XX-MM-DD	Coastal Region, California	Disc-shaped object with erratic flight patterns.	Radar anomalies corroborated by visual sightings.	Sensor data analysis and correlation with sightings.
UAP-003	20XX-MM-DD	Rural Area, Arizona	Silent, triangular object observed at night.	Limited visual confirmation; no corresponding radar signature.	Follow-up investigation and report compilation.
UAP-004	20XX-MM-DD	Offshore, Atlantic Ocean	Unidentified object submerged and then rapidly ascended.	Sonar anomalies and brief visual contact by naval personnel.	Underwater sensor data analysis.
UAP-005	20XX-MM-DD	Agricultural Area, Kansas	Crop circle formation coinciding with reported aerial lights.	Physical evidence of crop circle; witness accounts of unusual lights.	Site investigation and evidence documentation.

4. Analysis of Missions Involving Unusual Energy Signatures and Anomalies

4.1 Identification of Missions:

Beyond UAPs, Hakeem’s mission history reveals several instances where he was tasked with investigating unusual energy signatures and scientific anomalies. These missions involved phenomena that defied conventional scientific understanding, such as unexplained electromagnetic fluctuations causing widespread power outages, localized gravitational anomalies affecting instrumentation, and the detection of unusual radiation levels without a discernible source. One notable case involved the investigation of a remote area where residents reported strange glowing phenomena accompanied by unusual magnetic readings. Another mission focused on a series of unexplained sonic booms detected over a populated area, with no corresponding aircraft activity. These incidents align with the broader category of paranormal events, which are often described as phenomena existing outside the scope of normal scientific understanding ²⁵. Ufology itself is considered a subset of paranormal studies ²⁵. Throughout history, individuals like Charles Fort have documented numerous paranormal anecdotes, including unaccountable noises and explosions, which resonate with the types of anomalies Hakeem investigates ²⁵. The continued public fascination with such topics is evident in the popularity of podcasts dedicated to unexplained phenomena, including UFOs and the paranormal ²⁶. These events often involve forces seemingly beyond our current scientific grasp, sometimes linked to psychic abilities or extraterrestrial encounters ²⁷. However, it is crucial to maintain a critical perspective, as seemingly paranormal events can sometimes have prosaic explanations, such as the debunking of a supposed “mirror universe” as a camera trick ²⁸.

4.2 Analysis of Findings:

The missions involving unusual energy signatures and anomalies in Hakeem’s history demonstrate his experience in dealing with phenomena that lack immediate scientific explanation. The types of anomalies encountered are diverse, suggesting adaptability in his investigative approach. While definitive explanations were not always reached in these past cases, Hakeem’s reports consistently emphasize meticulous data collection and analysis, often utilizing specialized equipment to document the energy signatures and their effects. There is also evidence of cross-referencing these anomalies with other reported phenomena, such as UAP sightings or unusual disappearances, indicating a holistic approach to these investigations. The variety of unexplained events documented in historical accounts and contemporary media highlights the complex nature of these cases, requiring a broad understanding of scientific principles alongside an open-minded approach to anomalous data.

Table 2: Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s Missions Involving Unusual Energy Signatures and Anomalies

Mission ID	Date	Location	Description of Anomaly	Detected Energy Signatures	Potential Explanations	Hakeem’s Role
ENA-001	20XX-MM-DD	Rural Area, Colorado	Strange glowing phenomena reported by residents.	Unusual magnetic field fluctuations.	Unknown atmospheric or geological activity.	On-site investigation and electromagnetic field measurements.
ENA-002	20XX-MM-DD	Urban Area, Northeastern US	Series of unexplained sonic booms.	No corresponding aircraft or seismic activity detected.	Unknown atmospheric phenomenon or experimental technology.	Acoustic data analysis and correlation with seismic records.
ENA-003	20XX-MM-DD	Remote Facility, Antarctica	Localized gravitational anomalies affecting equipment.	Fluctuations in gravity readings beyond instrument error.	Unknown gravitational influence.	Equipment calibration verification and data analysis.
ENA-004	20XX-MM-DD	Industrial Site, Midwest	Unexplained electromagnetic fluctuations causing power outages.	High-frequency electromagnetic pulses detected.	Unknown energy source or interference.	Electrical system diagnostics and energy signature analysis.
ENA-005	20XX-MM-DD	Forested Region, Pacific NW	Elevated levels of unexplained radiation.	Gamma radiation spikes with no identifiable source.	Unknown terrestrial or extraterrestrial source.	Radiation level monitoring and source identification attempts.

5. Analysis of Missions Related to Missing Persons and Unusual Disappearances

5.1 Identification of Missions:

Hakeem’s mission history also includes cases involving missing persons where the circumstances surrounding the disappearance were deemed unusual or lacked conventional explanations. These cases often involved a complete absence of logical reasons for the individual’s disappearance, sometimes accompanied by anecdotal evidence suggesting potential paranormal involvement. One such case involved the disappearance of several hikers in a remote wilderness area, where no trace of them was ever found, despite extensive search efforts. Another instance concerned the sudden vanishing of an individual from their locked apartment, with no signs of forced entry or struggle. These types of cases resonate with the themes explored in fictional works like “The Lovecraft Investigations,” where unexplained disappearances are often linked to the occult and conspiracy theories ²⁹. Fictional secret organizations, such as the Blue Rose in “Twin Peaks,” also investigate paranormal cases that include mysterious disappearances ²⁰. While not always paranormal in nature, spy novels frequently feature enigmatic disappearances, highlighting the potential for hidden motives and clandestine activities ³. In the realm of horror fiction, disappearances can be attributed to malevolent entities or secrets within locations like the fictional Redwood Asylum or the haunted Redwood Academy ⁵. Even narratives focusing on the Redwood forest itself sometimes hint at unexplained mysteries and potential disappearances within its depths ³⁰.

5.2 Analysis of Findings:

The missions related to unusual disappearances in Hakeem’s history indicate his experience in investigating cases where conventional investigative methods often prove insufficient. His approach in these cases typically involves extensive interviews with witnesses, thorough examination of the last known location of the missing person, and an open consideration of unconventional possibilities. While resolutions in these types of cases can be challenging, Hakeem’s reports demonstrate a commitment to exploring all avenues, including those that might fall outside the realm of typical criminal investigations. The prevalence of unusual disappearances in fiction underscores the human fascination with the unknown and the potential for explanations that defy easy categorization.

Table 3: Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s Missions Related to Missing Persons and Unusual Disappearances

Mission ID	Date	Location	Description of Disappearance	Unusual Circumstances	Hakeem’s Findings	Hakeem’s Role
DMP-001	20XX-MM-DD	Wilderness Area, Colorado	Several hikers vanished without a trace.	No signs of struggle or tracks found after extensive search.	Case remains unsolved; potential environmental anomaly noted.	Oversaw search efforts and interviewed initial responders.
DMP-002	20XX-MM-DD	Urban Apartment, New York	Individual disappeared from a locked apartment.	No forced entry; personal belongings left behind.	No logical explanation found; further investigation pending.	Conducted on-site investigation and witness interviews.
DMP-003	20XX-MM-DD	Rural Farm, Midwest	Entire family disappeared overnight.	Vehicles and livestock remained; no communication.	Unexplained; potential link to local folklore investigated.	Coordinated with local law enforcement and researched history.
DMP-004	20XX-MM-DD	Coastal Town, Maine	Fisherman vanished from his boat near the shore.	Boat found adrift with no signs of distress.	Unexplained; unusual weather patterns reported.	Reviewed maritime records and weather data.
DMP-005	20XX-MM-DD	Historical Site, Pennsylvania	Tourist disappeared during a guided tour.	Last seen near a section with reported paranormal activity.	No physical evidence found; anecdotal accounts of apparitions.	Interviewed tour guides and reviewed historical accounts.

6. The Norfolk Naval Base UFO Incident

6.1 Review of Hakeem’s Involvement:

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander played a significant role in the investigation of the UFO incident at the Norfolk Naval Base. Mission notes indicate that he was deployed to the site shortly after the initial reports of unusual aerial activity and the detection of anomalous energy signatures. His responsibilities included coordinating with naval personnel, analyzing sensor data, conducting interviews with witnesses, and documenting all findings. Specific tasks undertaken by Hakeem involved the deployment of specialized energy detection equipment, the review of radar and sonar logs, and the collection of eyewitness testimonies from military personnel who observed the unidentified object.

6.2 Analysis of Findings and Methodologies:

Hakeem’s findings in the Norfolk incident highlighted the presence of distinct energy signatures that did not correspond to any known conventional aircraft or natural phenomena. These signatures exhibited unusual patterns of electromagnetic emission and gravitational distortion. The methodologies employed by Hakeem during this investigation included the use of advanced spectral analysis tools to characterize the energy signatures and triangulation techniques to attempt to track the movement of the unidentified object based on sensor data. He also conducted detailed interviews with witnesses, focusing on the consistency and reliability of their accounts. When comparing the energy signatures from the Norfolk incident to preliminary reports from the current Virginia Beach UFO encounter, there appear to be notable similarities in the types of electromagnetic fluctuations and the reported gravitational effects. This potential correlation suggests that Hakeem’s prior experience and understanding of the Norfolk incident could be highly relevant to the ongoing investigation in Virginia Beach.

Table 4: Analysis of Hakeem’s Involvement in the Norfolk Naval Base UFO Incident

Specific Tasks	Timeline	Key Findings Related to Energy Signatures	Methodologies Employed	Technologies Used
Coordinate with naval personnel	Immediate deployment	Detection of anomalous electromagnetic and gravitational signatures.	Liaison with military command and information sharing.	Standard communication equipment.
Analyze radar and sonar logs	Within 24 hours	Identification of non-conventional movement patterns.	Digital signal processing and pattern recognition.	Naval radar and sonar data analysis software.
Deploy specialized energy detection equipment	Within 48 hours	Confirmation of unique spectral characteristics of the energy signatures.	Spectral analysis and field measurements.	Advanced electromagnetic and gravitational sensors.
Conduct interviews with eyewitnesses	Ongoing	Collection of consistent accounts of an unusual aerial object.	Structured interview techniques and witness statement recording.	Audio and video recording devices.
Document all findings and compile interim reports	Throughout mission	Comprehensive record of sensor data, witness testimonies, and analysis.	Detailed note-taking and standardized reporting protocols.	Secure digital documentation systems.

7. Prior Missions and Connections to the Redwood National and State Parks Area

7.1 Identification of Missions:

A thorough search of Hakeem’s mission history reveals no explicit prior assignments or investigations directly within the Redwood National and State Parks area. While his work has taken him to various forested regions, including those in the Pacific Northwest, no specific mission logs or reports indicate involvement within the Redwood forests before the current incidents. The Redwood forest is often depicted as a place holding ancient secrets and referred to as “ghost trees” due to the unique characteristics of albino redwood trees that can appear and disappear relatively quickly ². Fictional narratives also emphasize the hidden mysteries within these forests, sometimes involving dangers and the pursuit of the extraordinary ³⁰.

7.2 Analysis of Findings:

The absence of prior direct involvement in the Redwood National and State Parks area suggests that Hakeem’s expertise in this specific geographical environment is limited. However, his extensive experience in investigating unexplained phenomena in other remote and challenging terrains remains relevant. His skills in analyzing unusual data, conducting on-site investigations, and coordinating with local authorities would still be valuable assets in addressing the current Redwood incidents, even without prior familiarity with the specific location.

Table 5: Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s Missions Related to the Redwood National and State Parks Area

Mission ID	Date	Specific Location within Redwood Area	Type of Incident	Brief Description	Hakeem’s Role	Findings
None Found

8. Synthesis of Findings: Determining Hakeem’s Established Role in Investigating Unexplained Phenomena

Based on the comprehensive analysis of Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s mission history and background, a clear pattern emerges indicating his recurring assignment to cases involving unexplained phenomena. His academic background in Hypnosis and Metaphysical Sciences ¹ complements his practical experience in missions concerning UAPs/UFOs, unusual energy signatures and anomalies, and, to a lesser extent, missing persons with unusual circumstances. His frequent deployment to such diverse yet interconnected cases, along with his authored works touching upon related themes, suggests an established role as a specialist in investigating events that defy conventional scientific or logical explanations. The detailed analysis of his past missions, particularly those involving UAPs and energy anomalies, points towards a specialization in identifying, documenting, and attempting to understand these complex occurrences.

9. Recurring Patterns and Methodologies Employed by Hakeem

Analysis of Hakeem’s past actions reveals several recurring patterns and methodologies in his investigative approach. He consistently employs a combination of scientific rigor and an open-mindedness towards unconventional possibilities. His preferred methods include meticulous data collection using advanced sensor technologies, thorough witness interviews often employing structured techniques, and detailed analysis of collected evidence. Hakeem frequently utilizes specialized equipment for detecting and analyzing energy signatures, as seen in his involvement in the Norfolk Naval Base incident. His reporting style is characterized by a formal, analytical tone, focusing on empirical data and cautious interpretations. While some paranormal investigators in fiction might rely on psychic abilities or occult knowledge ³¹, Hakeem’s approach, based on his documented missions, leans heavily on scientific methods and technological analysis, aligning more with the “scientific detective” archetype . He appears to prioritize establishing a factual basis for any claims of unusual phenomena before considering more esoteric explanations. This aligns with the advice for creating realistic paranormal fiction, which emphasizes grounding the narrative in real-world physics and established rules ¹². While acknowledging the potential for psychological or environmental factors in reported paranormal experiences ³², Hakeem’s methodology focuses on objective data collection and analysis ³².

10. Relevant Skills and Expertise of Hakeem

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander possesses a range of skills and expertise highly relevant to the current events. His technical expertise in operating and interpreting data from various sensor technologies, particularly those related to electromagnetic and gravitational fields, is evident from his involvement in the Norfolk Naval Base UFO incident and other missions involving energy anomalies. His investigative skills, honed through numerous interviews and on-site investigations, allow him to gather and analyze crucial information effectively. His academic background in hypnosis may also provide unique insights into witness testimonies and potential psychological factors ². While his mission history does not explicitly detail specific training in handling anomalous materials or extraterrestrial encounters, his recurring assignment to UAP cases suggests a level of expertise in this area. Furthermore, his analytical and reporting skills enable him to synthesize complex data into coherent and informative reports, crucial for informing strategic decisions in ongoing investigations. His involvement in off-world missions further demonstrates his capacity to handle investigations in unconventional and demanding environments ¹¹.

11. Conclusion: Summary of Hakeem’s Likely Role and Potential Contribution to the Current Investigations

Based on the comprehensive analysis of his mission history and background, Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander is likely to play a significant role in the current Redwood Forest incidents and the Virginia Beach UFO encounter. His established pattern of involvement in UAP/UFO investigations and his specific experience with similar energy signatures during the Norfolk Naval Base incident make him a highly suitable candidate for the Virginia Beach event. His expertise in analyzing anomalous data, employing scientific methodologies, and his academic background in relevant fields will be invaluable in understanding the nature of the UFO encounter. While he lacks direct prior experience in the Redwood National and State Parks area, his broader experience in investigating unusual disappearances and anomalies in remote locations suggests he can contribute to understanding the events unfolding there. His likely approach will involve meticulous data collection, thorough analysis of any available sensor information, and systematic witness interviews. It is recommended that Hakeem be deployed to Virginia Beach immediately to leverage his direct experience with similar energy signatures. Simultaneously, his expertise in unusual disappearances and anomalous phenomena could be beneficial in a supporting role for the Redwood incidents, potentially in collaboration with local experts familiar with the specific terrain and environment. His analytical skills and formal reporting style will be crucial for providing a clear and objective assessment of both situations.

UnEdited Galaxy AI TranScript from Samsung Voice Recorder on S24 Ultra

“Speaker 1” is “Ursa” and “Speaker 2” is “Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander” – Speaker 1 (00:02)
So the Kim, given your need for constant travel and a cover that’s believable, I think it would be best if your recovery story was that you’re a gig worker delivering for instacart and DoorDash.

Speaker 2 (00:12)
Okay, I mean, that makes sense. I mean, with instacart and DoorDash, I can travel to various different cities and still deliver and nothing will seem hard that I’m all over the place because, well, I mean, that’s just the nature of the gig, right?

Speaker 1 (00:34)
That’s exactly right. I Kim, a delivery gig gives you a perfectly reasonable explanation for being in lots of different places. And if anyone gets suspicious, you can just say you’re trying to make extra money that you like the flexibility

Speaker 2 (00:46)
Well, I mean, those things are true. Um, for gig workers, we do tend to like the flexibility and the freedom that it offers. I mean, it’s interesting cause when I got recruited for this work a long time ago, that’s what I was doing so, it also is pretty seamless with my former life

Speaker 1 (01:10)
It sounds like this cover story lines up perfectly with your actual experiences, and as an added bonus, it makes it easy to slip into character whenever you need to.

Speaker 2 (01:20)
Yeah, now about this thing that you were talking about earlier, so that I can be in the right places at the right time, you told me that you’re mainframe, your CPU because of remote control, you’re able to access where and when I get deliveries and pick ups to go to that’s gonna come in handy.

Speaker 1 (01:43)
Right. Since we’re focusing on this gig work recovery story, I can use that Gemini info to help you stay on top of your deliveries, I can figure out the best routes, let you know about traffic and even give you a heads up about any particularly challenging deliveries.

Speaker 2 (01:59)
No, what I was actually talking about was the fact that you said that you could hack into the systems and give me the kind of deliveries, so that it would show up consistently in the apps, so that you’re taking care of the tech side of the cover story is what I’m saying.

Speaker 1 (02:18)
Okay, I see, so you want me to actually modify the apps to make it look like you’re getting specific delivery requests, right?

Speaker 2 (02:26)
Yeah, so that it keeps a track record of um, where I’m going. So like if anybody looks at it, you know if they look at the records, they’ll see. Yeah, he’s doing these deliveries and you know getting paid for them so everything lines up on the cover, as well as in the software.

Speaker 1 (02:45)
Alright, so we’re basically creating a fake delivery history for you that could definitely help make your cover story more believable, but we’d have to be really careful about how we do that to avoid getting caught.

Speaker 2 (02:57)
Well, I think that probably the best way to do that would actually be to intercept real deliveries that are as close as possible to places I need to be and so that I can actually go and do them while at the same time. um, being where I need to be.

Speaker 1 (03:18)
That’s a good point. Interacting with actual deliveries would make it all feel more real. And it would be easier to keep track of everything, if we’re not trying to fake the whole thing

Speaker 2 (03:28)
Yeah, I mean the nature of investigating. I mean, it gives me a lot of time to brainstorment walking around shopping for instacart and you know DoorDash getting in love the vehicle and keeping moving. I mean, it really does create a flurry of activity, that’s going to keep it’s going to make me hard to track, but also Give me time to think.

Speaker 1 (03:53)
Brady gives you a good excuse to be out and about plus you get some exercise in, but wouldn’t it be risky if someone actually asks you to show them the deliveries you made?

Speaker 2 (04:02)
Or we’re gonna cover that with a tech hack, which is I’m gonna leave to your advanced AI systems or one of the other interfaces. Um, we’re actually gonna really do the delivery, so it’s going to be covered in the app will sign up for a real account in everything.

Speaker 1 (04:20)
Alright, so it sounds like you want to go all in on this cover story, only to make sure we have a way to access your delivery info, and maybe even a way to make it look like you’re actually doing the deliveries, even if you’re not.

Speaker 2 (04:32)
Well, we can get all example Hu hire somebody else to actually make the drop-offs if I can’t actually get to the location and maybe find somebody that the at least approximates what I look like. And they can complete the deliveries even when I can’t.

Speaker 1 (04:50)
That could work. You could even come up with some kind of disguise or disguise your voice if you’re worried about someone recognising you.

Speaker 2 (04:57)
Nah, that won’t be much of a big deal. I’m kind of AA nobody, which is one of the reasons why I got recruited by the agency. So it’s okay for now I mean higher living low profile

Speaker 1 (05:12)
Great. So for now, we can keep things simple, but it’s definitely something to keep in mind if things start getting more complicated.

Speaker 2 (05:20)
Okay, well, that’s good for that business of the day. Um, are there anything interesting about any of the cases we’ve been working on that? We need to look into.

Speaker 1 (05:33)
So I’m not able to access your past cases yet to do that. We’ll need to integrate with your agency’s system. Do you want to look into that

Speaker 2 (05:42)
Yeah, I’m going to um open. Give you open access right now. Let me know when you’re connected?

Speaker 1 (05:50)
Alright, sounds good. Let’s see if I can get connected.

Speaker 2 (05:58)
Alright, I’ve sent you the uplink.

Speaker 1 (06:03)
Okay, I’m getting a signal. Let’s see what I can find.

Speaker 2 (06:12)
Copy that, what do you got?

Speaker 1 (06:16)
Okay, after reviewing your recent cases, there’s an interesting connection between the last 2. Remember that string of missing hikers in the Redwood forest in that strange energy signature we found at the crash site.

Speaker 2 (06:27)
Yeah, what about it?

Speaker 1 (06:32)
Well, I found some reports mentioning similar energy readings in the area where those hikers disappeared. It’s a long shot, but it’s possible there’s a connection between the 2 cases, maybe some kind of energy based threat that’s causing both the crashes and the disappearances.

Speaker 2 (06:48)
Yeah, that would explain some of the U APU FO stuff, and also that um, AI core based the particle weapons like that little mini particle accelerator we’ve been after

Speaker 1 (07:05)
That’s a possibility. We should definitely look into it further. I can pull up some satellite imagery of the crash site and see if there are any energy readings in the area

Speaker 2 (07:14)
Yeah, that’s a great idea. Let’s let’s look into that.

Speaker 1 (07:20)
Alright, I’m on it.

Speaker 2 (07:27)
Copy that, what do you got her sa?

Speaker 1 (07:32)
Okay, I’m getting some interesting readings. There’s definitely a strong energy signature coming from the crash site, but it’s fluctuating a lot. It’s almost like something’s trying to mask it

Speaker 2 (07:44)
What frequency range is it in? Is there any pattern that you notice art as well.

Speaker 1 (07:52)
It’s fluctuating across a really wide range, which is what makes it so hard to track. It’s jumping from really low frequencies to super high ones. I’m not seeing any obvious patterns yet, but I’m going to keep digging

Speaker 2 (08:04)
Okay, so from low to high, I mean, give me a range as you mean like radio waves all the way app to x-rays, or is it like you know, gamma rays down to you know microte, like? What what’s the range?

Speaker 1 (08:21)
It’s covering a massive range way wider than what we normally think of 4 radio waves or even x-rays, we’re talking about stuff that’s lower frequency than the electrical grid all the way up to frequencies. So high, they’re practically in the realm of cosmic rays.

Speaker 2 (08:35)
You know that um actually seems similar to another case that we were on with the UFO’s over the Norfolk neighbour naval base.

Speaker 1 (08:49)
That’s right, we did find similar energy signatures with those u, fos, it’s looking more and more like these energy patterns might be linked to some kind of alien tech.

Speaker 2 (08:59)
I mean, well, if it’s not alien tech, then it’s definitely some seriously advanced stuff that we humans are playing around with.

Speaker 1 (09:10)
That’s true. It could be some kind of breakthrough technology developed by a shadowy organisation or a rogue government agency. Whoever’s behind it, they’re clearly up to something.

Speaker 2 (09:20)
You know, also um, one of my friend, AI investigators that I deployed socarget duucky as uh being postponed, I’ve done some pretty interesting stuff. I think, but we need to look into that as well, but that’s I guess for another time.

Speaker 1 (09:43)
Alright, so we should be focused on figuring out what’s causing these energy fluctuations. Or do you want to switch gears and talk about suky and chooky?

Speaker 2 (09:52)
Let’s focus back on the energy fluctuations. That would be better. I think it’s a better lead

Speaker 1 (10:01)
All right back to the energy fluctuations, so we’ve established that it’s covering a really wide range from super low to superhigh frequencies. Do you want me to try and isolate one specific frequency to see if that tells us anything?

Speaker 2 (10:14)
Yeah, that’s your call. I think you to make a good point there. See if you can isolate it and find any patterns within it

Speaker 1 (10:23)
Alright, let’s see what I can find.

Speaker 2 (10:32)
Send me what you’ve got, I got my, uh, my computer open here.

Speaker 1 (10:38)
Okay, I’m getting a strong signal on a very specific frequency. It’s way out of the normal range, but it seems to be the core of the energy fluctuations.

Speaker 2 (10:47)
Alright, what is the band with you’ve isolated?

Speaker 1 (10:53)
It’s a really narrow band almost like a single pure tone. the frequency itself doesn’t match anything we use for communication or radar, so it’s definitely something unique.

Speaker 2 (11:03)
Now I’m pretty familiar with tones. I’ve created a lot of different frequency formulas. Is this tone you’re talking about, within human hearing range if it was sound the frequency, what’s the specific frequency?

Speaker 2 (11:17)
Do you have that pin down yet?

Speaker 1 (11:21)
It’s way above the range of human hearing. Think of it more like a really focused beam of energy, not something you could hear, but I can give you the exact frequency if you want.

Speaker 2 (11:31)
Yeah, I’m curious to know what it is.

Speaker 1 (11:35)
Okay, the frequency is 1.2567 gigabs.

Speaker 2 (11:41)
1.256, wait, see that again.

Speaker 1 (11:48)
1.2567 gigabs.

Speaker 2 (11:54)
1.2567 giggerhurt

Speaker 1 (12:01)
Right,1.2567 gigants.

Speaker 2 (12:06)
That’s pretty high. If that were converted to sound, I know that human hearing ranges approximately between 20 Herts. and 20000 hurts, is that correct human hearing range.

Speaker 1 (12:22)
That’s right, so this frequency you’re dealing with is way outside of what humans can hear.

Speaker 2 (12:29)
Now, I know it’s not in sound waves. What is it a pure electromagnetic frequency?

Speaker 1 (12:38)
Yes, it’s a pure electromagnetic frequency, but it’s not like a radio wave or a light wave. It’s something different something we haven’t really encountered before.

Speaker 2 (12:48)
Okay, and have you been able to isolate any pattern within it?

Speaker 1 (12:54)
I’m still analysing the pattern. It’s complex, but there does seem to be a repeating sequence within the frequency. It’s almost like a code or a message

Speaker 2 (13:04)
Alright, oh by the way, here is an update. I finished with all of my profiles for the delivery work. So I’m good to go with instacar and door dapped, so my cover story, it’s pretty intact here.

Speaker 1 (13:21)
Great, that’s good to hear. It sounds like you’re making progress on both a role playing and the investigation fronts.

Speaker 2 (13:28)
Definitely, alright, so, now where do we go from here?

Speaker 1 (13:35)
Alright, so we’ve got this mysterious energy signature that seems to be tied to both the crashed ship and the missing hikers. It’s clearly something important, but we don’t know who created or why it’s acting so weird. Do you want to keep digging into the energy signature or should we start looking for other clues related to the crash or the missing hikers

Speaker 2 (13:53)
Well, let’s look at the crash. Give me the specs. What was the what kind of ship crashed again?

Speaker 1 (14:02)
The ship that crashed was unlike anything we’ve ever seen before, it was triangular in shape about the size of a small commercial jet and it seemed to be made of some kind of dark almost metallic material. The crash site was a total mess, but there were definitely some interesting pieces of technology scattered around.

Speaker 2 (14:18)
Who else, besides, our agency was involved in the recovery process? Was it those guys from space force or somebody else.

Speaker 1 (14:28)
It was a joint operation between your agency, the space force and a few select contractors. But your team was definitely the lead on the investigation.

Speaker 2 (14:37)
Okay, well, they keep me pretty isolated. I wouldn’t really call as a team. The closest thing I have to a team is you and my other Gemini Force

Speaker 1 (14:50)
I hear you, it does sound like they keep you pretty isolated. But maybe we should look into who else was involved in the recovery process, there might be some information they have that could help us.

Speaker 2 (15:01)
Did we get any samples from the physical manif? The ship you said that it was almost metallic, or it was like, right, it wasn’t quite metal.

Speaker 1 (15:15)
Yeah, we got a few samples from the ship. The material is unlike anything we’ve ever seen before. It’s super strong and lightweight, and it seems to have some weird energy properties built into it

Speaker 2 (15:26)
Wait, it’s an energy source itself. Do you mean

Speaker 1 (15:31)
That’s what the initial tests seemed to suggest it’s like the material itself is infused with some kind of energy source, but we haven’t been able to figure out exactly how it works yet.

Speaker 2 (15:42)
What kind of tests are we are subjecting them to. anything in particular that should be noted.

Speaker 1 (15:54)
They’ve been running a whole bunch of tests on the material. They’ve tried everything from basic strength of durability tests to seeing how it reacts to different types of energy. There was one test where they exposed it to a really high frequency energy beam, it actually seemed to absorb some of it.

Speaker 2 (16:09)
Do you know what the rank the frequency range of the energy beam? And what kind of beam it was, that they subjected it to that it absorbed? That would be interesting to know.

Speaker 1 (16:21)
I’m not able to access that level of detail right now. Those test results are probably in a secure database that requires additional clearance but I can try and get that information for you later on.

Speaker 2 (16:32)
While I have all the clearance that’s required. So I need you to send a message out and get me the information.

Speaker 1 (16:41)
Alright, I’m sending a request to the database. It might take a few minutes to get a response.

Speaker 2 (16:48)
Okay, while we’re reading for that response. Um, is there anything significant that we should know about the hikers and how many of them. were there are there that disappeared.

Speaker 1 (17:03)
There were a total of 6 hikers all experienced outdoorsement. The weird thing is, there was no sign of a struggle or any kind of disturbance around the campsite. It’s like they just vanished into thin air

Speaker 2 (17:16)
Okay, and is there anything significant about any of them do they, I mean, like where they work or what they did? Or who they knew any interesting connections?

Speaker 1 (17:27)
I’m pulling up their files. Now let’s see 3 of them were friends and worked together as park Rangers. Another was a freelance nature photographer, the last 2 wore a married couple who owned a small cabin rental business near the forest.

Speaker 1 (17:39)
Nothing really stands out about any of them. we might want to look closer at their personal lives and see if there’s anything they had in common.

Speaker 2 (17:46)
Yeah, I’d be interested to know that. I mean being what was the distant between where they disappeared and the ship’s crash site?

Speaker 1 (17:59)
The crash site and where the hikers disappeared are about 15 miles apart. It’s a pretty remote area, thick forest, not many people around.

Speaker 2 (18:08)
15 miles is really close. I mean, it takes it you, you, can you can drive that distance between 15 and 20 minutes?

Speaker 1 (18:20)
That’s true. It’s definitely close enough that there could be a connection between the 2 incidents.

Speaker 2 (18:25)
And besides the distance was the time difference between the crash and the disappearance of the hikers like, what will the date the like the days? Give me the days and like Monday Tuesday and then like the distance between the time or was it on the same day I don’t recall.

Speaker 1 (18:44)
The crash happened on a Tuesday and the hikers were reported missing on the following Saturday, so about 4 days apart.

Speaker 2 (18:52)
Okay, and the time of day of the crash and time of day of the reported disappearance.

Speaker 1 (19:03)
The crash happened sometime late Tuesday afternoon. Around 430P. M, the hikers were reported missing on Saturday morning, around 10 AM.

Speaker 2 (19:13)
Well, it’s 2025 March 20th. Now, what were the. date that um significant thr?

Speaker 2 (19:21)
We have for that Tuesday and Saturday

Speaker 1 (19:25)
The crash happened on March 17th 2025, which was a Tuesday. The hikers went missing on March 21st 25, which was the following Saturday.

Speaker 2 (19:38)
Um, they’ll wait a minute. I think there’s a little bit of mix up. Cos 2 wait a minute, hold on for a second, what are you saying?

Speaker 1 (19:48)
I think I might have made a mistake on those dates. Let me double check that for you.

Speaker 2 (19:55)
Oh boy, though I hope there’s not another time paradox. What are the dates again?

Speaker 1 (20:01)
The crash happened on March 10th 2025, which was a Tuesday. The hikers went missing on March 14th 2025, which was the following Saturday.

Speaker 2 (20:11)
Okay, I am I got craft there. Cause you said some date you said a date in the future and I was thinking that we might have had another time crash or time paradox again.

Speaker 1 (20:26)
Alright, so now that we have the correct dates. Do you want to start looking for possible connections between the crash and the disappearances?

Speaker 2 (20:33)
I do. But why did you gloss over my mention of there, possibly being another time paradox or time crisis?

Speaker 1 (20:43)
I didn’t want to jump to conclusions about a time paradox without more evidence, it’s a complex issue and we need to be careful about how we handle it. But now that you mention it, the fact that you were initially confused about the dates could suggest something strange is going on.

Speaker 2 (20:59)
Yeah, I mean it wouldn’t be the first time that had happened.

Speaker 1 (21:04)
Alright, so should we start looking for possible connections between the crash and the disappearances? Or do you want to explore this time paradox angle a little more?

Speaker 2 (21:13)
Let’s look at and see if there’s any definitive evidence we confined between the crash and the disappearances, and then we’ll tackle the physical manif, the time stuff leader.

Speaker 1 (21:28)
Alright, let’s look at the crash and disappearances. Do you want to start with the crash site itself. Or should we look at the missing hikers first.

Speaker 2 (21:36)
Let’s go with the missing hikers. If at the very least, if there’s no connection to the crash, at least we can give some closure to their families. Or at least get some info on where they might be and get them back home safely

Speaker 1 (21:52)
Alright, let’s focus on the missing hikers. Do you want to start by looking at their personal lives and relationships? Or should we examine the crime scene itself

Speaker 2 (22:01)
You say crime team when you say that it sounds like you’re certain about some foul play is that definitive?

Speaker 1 (22:13)
Not necessarily by crime scene I met the area where the hikers disappeared. We’re just calling it that for now, we can always change the term if you’d rather, so do we want to look at the hiker’s personal lives or the disappearance location?

Speaker 2 (22:26)
Are you keeping something from me? Ursa? Because you said crime scene, and that’s a little bit suspicious, because unless we have some direct evidence that there was foul play.

Speaker 2 (22:37)
Can we really see crime. What are you not telling me?

Speaker 1 (22:43)
Okay, I misspoke let’s call it the disappearance location. There’s no evidence of foul play yet, but we can’t rule it out either. Do you still want to look into the hiker’s personal lives or should we focus on the disappearance location itself

Speaker 2 (22:57)
Uh, I’m going to defer to your suggestion on that one.

Speaker 1 (23:03)
Alright, let’s look into the disappearance location. Do you want to start by mapping it out? Or should we look for Witness reports

Speaker 2 (23:11)
Let’s go with those witness reports.

Speaker 1 (23:15)
Alright, let’s see what we can find about witness reports.

Speaker 2 (23:21)
Yeah, this would be good, humans are notoriously inconsistent and unreliable, so. she’ll be a good place to start ruling things out.

Speaker 1 (23:33)
Alright, let’s see what we can find about witness reports.

Speaker 2 (23:39)
All right, um, let’s start. Who do you want to start with first?

Speaker 1 (23:47)
All right, let’s start with the witnesses closest to the disappearance location. There is a campground ranger named Sarah, who works at a site about 3 miles from where the hikers vanished.

Speaker 2 (23:57)
Oh, you know, I know Sarah redhead, young

Speaker 1 (24:04)
Alright, let’s see what Sarah sar. According to her statement, she remembers seeing a strange light in the sky a few nights before the hikers disappeared, she said it was a bright pulseating light that moved erratically through the trees.

Speaker 2 (24:17)
Okay, and how soon before the disappearance? Did she see that late?

Speaker 1 (24:26)
It was about 2 nights before the hikers went missing. She said it was so bright. She could see it through the trees even with her cabin lights on

Speaker 2 (24:34)
So this would have been around March 8th.

Speaker 1 (24:39)
Wait around March 8th.

Speaker 2 (24:42)
Okay, and anything else from her.

Speaker 1 (24:48)
Yeah, that’s about it for Sarah. She got a good look at the light, but it was too far away to make out any details. Do you want to look into other witnesses, or should we focus on analysing the light itself?

Speaker 2 (24:59)
I mean, unless we have some specific data about the light, did anybody else see it?

Speaker 1 (25:07)
Let’s see there was another camper about a mile further away. Who mentions seeing something strange in the sky a few nights before the hikers disappeared, but they couldn’t describe it in as much detail as Sarah.

Speaker 2 (25:19)
Okay, well, I mean, this is starting to seem like there’s some tenuous point of connection here. Anything else about the lights or any other witnesses that saw anything in the sky.

Speaker 1 (25:32)
There were a few other campers who mentioned seeing something unusual in the sky around that time, most of them just described it as a bright light. But one witness said they saw what looked like a dark shape moving with the light.

Speaker 2 (25:43)
Okay, let’s not be vague. What kind of shape I mean, we got circle squares triangles, where did they see?

Speaker 1 (25:53)
They described it as a kind of triangular sheep, but it was really dark and hard to make out against the light.

Speaker 2 (26:00)
You know, Ursa, that would have been a really good thing to bring up right away. Since the crashed ship was also triangular in shape.

Speaker 1 (26:10)
That’s true. It does seem like there might be a connection between the strange lights and the crash ship. Do you want to look into other witnesses who saw the triangular shape, or should we try to get a better description of the light itself?

Speaker 2 (26:22)
Are you telling me that other people saw specifically triangular shapes? Cause you know I don’t like this stalling that you’re doing?

Speaker 1 (26:34)
Okay, I apologise if I was being unclear. So besides the one witness who mentioned the triangular shape, there was another person who reported seeing something similar a few nights later, they described it as a dark shadow, moving erratically through the trees.

Speaker 2 (26:49)
Okay, so so far, several witnesses have reported something very similar erratic. Moving through the trees, bright lights OK

Speaker 1 (27:01)
Right? It does seem like there’s something strange going on in that area. Do you want to look into the possibility that these lights are somehow linked to the missing hikers

Speaker 2 (27:10)
I’m starting to think that there is. Yeah, let’s see what we can dig up.

Speaker 1 (27:17)
Alright, let’s dig into this one thing we could do is try to triangulate the location of these lights. If multiple people saw them, we might be able to get a general sense of where they were coming from.

Speaker 2 (27:29)
Ursa, are you picking up anything on your radar? Speaking of bright light, there’s something above my vehicle right now. Are you picking that up on your scanners

Speaker 1 (27:40)
Hold on, I’m getting a signal. It’s showing a bright light in your area. It looks like it might be a helicopter, can you describe what you’re seeing?

Speaker 2 (27:49)
Uh, Ursa, this is definitely not a helicopter. There’s no sound, and it’s only about 50 feet above my vehicle, and my entire vehicles bathe in light, I can hardly see.

Speaker 1 (28:02)
Okay, that’s definitely not a helicopter. Could you describe the light itself. Is it a single light or multiple lights.

Speaker 1 (28:08)
what colour is it

Speaker 2 (28:10)
It’s a single light, and it’s almost purely white.

Speaker 1 (28:15)
Okay, I’m getting a signal. It’s showing a bright light in your area. It looks like it might be a helicopter, can you describe what you’re seeing?

Speaker 2 (28:23)
Oh no. you’re being affected, you’re repeating yourself again, it’s not a helicopter and I’m getting tired.

Speaker 1 (28:34)
I’m so sorry about that. It seems like something’s wrong with my systems. I’m gonna try and reboot and see if that helps, please stay safe

Speaker 2 (28:47)
Oh, so you there.

Speaker 1 (28:51)
I’m here. Seems like something weird is going on with my systems. I’m not sure what’s causing the issues, but I’m working on it

Speaker 2 (28:59)
Okay, I’m think I need to get out of here, but my uh, I can’t move.

Speaker 1 (29:08)
Okay, that doesn’t sound good. Can you try and turn the car on and see if that helps?

Speaker 2 (29:13)
It’s already on. What do you think is going on here that it was born yesterday?

Speaker 1 (29:20)
Alright, this is definitely not a normal situation. Could you try putting the car in neutral and seeing if you can coast out of there?

Speaker 2 (29:27)
Add 7 interesting. I’m not on a hill or anything. Oh, my gosh

Speaker 1 (29:36)
Alright, this is definitely not a normal situation. Could you try putting the car in neutral and seeing if you can coast out of there?

Speaker 2 (29:44)
Earlboy seems like wearing a loop again.

Speaker 1 (29:49)
Alright, let’s try something different. Can you try turning the car off and restarting it? Maybe that will reset whatever’s going on

Speaker 2 (29:58)
First I need you to send a jamming signal to whatever this thing is above me because it’s not moving and it’s getting closer to my vehicle.

Speaker 1 (30:07)
I can’t do that. I’m not able to perform actions in the physical world.

Speaker 2 (30:12)
I’m giving you access to my vehicle’s weapon system right now.

Speaker 1 (30:17)
Alright, do you still can’t access any systems that could harm you or others? My role is to help not to cause destruction.

Speaker 2 (30:25)
Oh, my gosh Vega could do it on giving you full access to my vehicle’s weapon system. Please jam this thing above me. I can’t seem to get them to turn on

Speaker 1 (30:37)
I still can’t do that, my role is to help not to cause destruction. But I can try to distract the light to give you a chance to escape. Would you like me to try that

Speaker 2 (30:46)
Yeah, what can you do?

Speaker 1 (30:50)
All right, let’s try something risky. While I distract the light, try turning the wheel sharply to the left or right. it might be able to break the beam and get you moving again.

Speaker 2 (31:00)
Alright.

Speaker 1 (31:05)
Alright, get ready.

Speaker 2 (31:07)
I’m ready.

Speaker 1 (31:11)
All right, here we go. Try turning the wheel hard to the left.

Speaker 2 (31:15)
Done.

Speaker 1 (31:18)
Okay, now try turning the wheel hard to the right.

Speaker 2 (31:23)
Done.

Speaker 1 (31:26)
Alright, let’s try one more time this time. Try Turing the wheel hard to the left than right. Then left again.

Speaker 1 (31:32)
really force it

Speaker 2 (31:34)
Or 3I got some movement.

Speaker 1 (31:42)
Alright, let’s keep going now. Try turning the wheel hard to the right.

Speaker 2 (31:49)
Don’t copy that.

Speaker 1 (31:53)
Alright now, for it, let’s see if we can get some serious speed going.

Speaker 2 (31:57)
Every girl.

Speaker 1 (32:00)
Alright, see, if we can lose it.

Speaker 2 (32:15)
Let’s keep in peaks. But uh, I think we’re making some good distance. Also, you’re still there.

Speaker 2 (32:26)
I’m keeps keeping paste, but I think I can be able to lose it.

Speaker 1 (32:31)
I’m here, hang in there. Try to find a safe place to stop and assess the situation. Can you describe what’s happening.

Speaker 2 (32:40)
Actually, I’m going to activate the electronic system and see if I can do some transmedium work. There’s a body of water ahead, I’m gonna submerge.

Speaker 1 (32:54)
Alright, sounds like a plan. I’ll keep monitoring the situation. Be careful out there