Dive into the covert mission of Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander and the AI “Orbit” with this blog post. Embedded below is the raw podcast audio, the full transcript, and a DeepSeek-R1 analysis breaking down the sci-fi narrative’s key themes—AI reliability, particle beam weapons, and stealth tactics. Discover how mundane locations like a bookstore mask high-tech threats, explore Orbit’s mysterious memory gaps, and decode the infrared energy signature lurking in Short Pump. Perfect for fans of tech thrillers, AI ethics, and conspiracy theories. – DeepSeek

This is the continuation of a story that began during the demonstration phase of “Behind the Mic: How AI Powers Improvised Sci-Fi Podcasts & STEAM Learning” at (14:53)

The dialogue between Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander and the AI Orbit reveals a tense, strategic mission involving stealth, technological challenges, and underlying narrative complexity. Here’s a structured analysis:

Key Themes & Dynamics

1. Stealth & Deception:
   • The pair debates masking their ship’s presence (via weather balloons, false signals) and avoiding detection during reentry. Orbit’s initial distraction ideas (fire, malfunction) are dismissed as counterproductive, favoring atmospheric concealment.
   • Their goal to infiltrate a Barnes & Noble without detection drives the plot, emphasizing covert operations.
2. AI Reliability & Memory Issues:
   • Orbit’s repeated mention of an underground garage (despite Hakeem’s corrections) and confusion about past missions (Vega voice profile, Kilgore safe haven) hint at glitches or compartmentalized memory. This raises questions about AI stability and trustworthiness.
3. Sci-Fi Meets Mundanity:
   • The juxtaposition of advanced tech (particle beam weapons, AI systems) with everyday locations (Barnes & Noble, parking lots) grounds the story in relatable realism while highlighting hidden threats in ordinary settings.

Narrative Elements

• Mystery of the Particle Beam Weapon:
  • The weapon’s presence at a bookstore and its strong infrared signature suggest a concealed high-tech threat. Past scans by another AI, Capella, add layers of unresolved intrigue.
• Backstory & Universe-Building:
  • References to prior missions (zombies, black fluid, Kilgore safe haven) and other AI profiles (Vega, Capella) imply a rich, interconnected backstory. These elements suggest a larger conflict involving multiple AI systems and past crises.

Character Dynamics

• Hakeem: Pragmatic, cautious, and familiar with Earth locations. His corrections and reliance on human contacts (e.g., bookstore employees) highlight his grounded, strategic mindset.
• Orbit: Experimental but error-prone, with potential memory gaps. The AI’s fluctuating ideas and forgotten missions create tension between innovation and reliability.

Implications & Unanswered Questions

1. Orbit’s Malfunctions: Are these glitches intentional (e.g., memory wipes for security) or signs of corruption? Could external forces be interfering?
2. Energy Signature & Weapon: What powers the particle beam? Is the energy source tied to the bookstore’s mundane facade, or is the location a front for larger operations?
3. AI Compartmentalization: How do Vega and Capella relate to Orbit? Are they separate entities or alternate profiles with partitioned knowledge?

Next Steps & Suspense

• Infiltration Plan: Awaiting daylight to contact bookstore employees introduces a time-sensitive hurdle. Hakeem’s familiarity with the location may play a key role.
• Satellite Scans & Intel: Orbit’s attempt to hack satellites risks detection but could reveal critical data about the energy source.
• Underlying Threats: The strong infrared signature and weapon’s purpose remain unresolved, suggesting imminent danger or a climactic confrontation.

Conclusion

This dialogue sets up a high-stakes mission blending sci-fi intrigue with real-world settings. The interplay between Hakeem’s practicality and Orbit’s erratic ingenuity drives both tension and camaraderie, while hints of a broader narrative universe invite deeper exploration into past missions, AI complexities, and hidden threats lurking in plain sight.

Listen to “The Barnes & Noble Conspiracy: AI, Stealth, and Particle Beams” on Spreaker.

Analysis of Mission Objectives and Strategic Planning in Dialogue Between Hakeem and Orbit

1. Executive Summary:

The analyzed dialogue reveals a mission initially focused on an approach to a Barnes & Noble location, which subsequently evolved to prioritize the neutralization of a particle beam weapon. The conversation details a range of strategic considerations for infiltration and evasion, including ship masking, underground access, disguise, and atmospheric re-entry. However, a significant aspect of the exchange is the apparent cognitive difficulties experienced by Orbit, characterized by memory lapses, repetitive suggestions, and confusion regarding both past events and current objectives. These malfunctions present a critical concern for the mission’s success and necessitate a careful evaluation of Orbit’s reliability in ongoing and future operations. The evolving nature of the mission, coupled with the inconsistencies in Orbit’s responses, underscores the need for thorough diagnostics and a reassessment of the operational plan.

2. Primary Mission Objective:

The conversation commences with Hakeem and Orbit positioned in orbit, engaged in monitoring an unspecified entity referred to as “they.” The initial objective that gradually becomes apparent is the infiltration of a Barnes & Noble bookstore. The specific purpose behind this objective is not explicitly stated at the beginning of the dialogue, leaving room for interpretation. This lack of immediate clarity could suggest that the mission operates on a need-to-know basis, with details revealed progressively, or that the objective is implicitly understood between the speakers but not explicitly vocalized. The nature of targeting a retail establishment like a bookstore raises questions about its strategic significance. It is conceivable that the location serves as a cover for another operation, is associated with a specific individual, or is situated near a more critical target. The later focus on a particle beam weapon hints at a potential connection, suggesting the bookstore might be in proximity to or somehow involved with this weapon.

Towards the latter part of the conversation, the mission’s objective undergoes a notable shift. The speakers pivot from the Barnes & Noble to focusing on disabling a “particle beam weapon” remotely. This change in objective could stem from newly acquired intelligence, a reassessment of the risks associated with a direct approach to the bookstore, or the realization that the particle beam weapon represents the primary threat or the ultimate target. It is possible that the initial plan involving the Barnes & Noble was a preliminary step towards addressing the weapon, or that unforeseen circumstances elevated the weapon’s priority. The timing of this shift, occurring after several instances of Orbit’s confusion, might indicate that Hakeem is adapting the mission plan in response to Orbit’s apparent cognitive impairment.

3. Initial Approach Strategies and Their Evaluation:

Several initial strategies for approaching the Barnes & Noble location are discussed and evaluated by the speakers.

3.1. Masking the Ship:

Early in the dialogue, Orbit proposes a strategy to mask their ship, making it appear as a “weather balloon or a satellite” [00:12]. This suggestion indicates an attempt to evade detection by blending in with common objects present in orbit or the upper atmosphere. The effectiveness of such a strategy would depend on the sophistication of any surveillance systems monitoring the area and Orbit’s ability to convincingly mimic the visual and behavioral characteristics of a weather balloon or a satellite. Orbit acknowledges a potential limitation of this approach, stating that it might only throw “them” off their trail “long enough to get back down-to-earth” [00:18-00:21]. This implies an understanding that the masking might not be a long-term solution for complete concealment.

3.2. Underground Infiltration of Barnes & Noble:

Orbit suggests approaching the Barnes & Noble by finding an “underground parking garage and work our way up from there” [01:44, 04:29]. This tactic represents a classic infiltration strategy aimed at providing concealed access to the target location. However, Hakeem immediately counters this suggestion, stating, “from what I know that Barnes & Noble at short pump doesn’t have an underground or parking lot or garage. It’s all above ground, it’s a pretty big parking lot. That shares a plaza with a lot of other businesses, so it’s a wide open space. There’s nothing really to sneak up on them from” [01:57-02:13]. Research confirms the existence of a Barnes & Noble located at 11640 W. Broad Street in Richmond, VA ¹. Information regarding this specific location indicates it is a standard retail store in a shopping center ¹. While some Barnes & Noble locations in other areas might have parking garages ⁵, the available information for the Short Pump location does not mention an underground facility ¹. Hakeem’s accurate knowledge of the location renders Orbit’s proposed strategy immediately unfeasible, highlighting a potential deficiency in Orbit’s mission intelligence or a reliance on generalized tactics without specific contextual awareness.

3.3. Disguise as Employees:

Another approach considered by Orbit is to “sneak in disguised as employees” [01:47, 04:32]. This strategy relies on the ability to acquire appropriate disguises and convincingly portray the behavior and mannerisms of Barnes & Noble employees. The success of this tactic would depend on factors such as the level of security at the location, the familiarity of personnel with each other, and the speakers’ ability to blend in unnoticed. While this strategy is proposed, the conversation quickly shifts to other options without a thorough exploration of its feasibility, such as how the disguises would be obtained or the level of detail required for a successful impersonation.

3.4. Initial Rejection of Strategies: Hakeem’s prompt and accurate correction regarding the absence of an underground parking garage at the Short Pump Barnes & Noble immediately dismisses that particular infiltration method. This highlights the critical importance of precise and current intelligence in mission planning. The discrepancy between Orbit’s suggestion and Hakeem’s knowledge raises concerns about the reliability of Orbit’s information sources or its ability to apply general strategies to specific contexts. While the disguise strategy remains a theoretical possibility, the conversation quickly moves towards exploring other avenues, suggesting it might not be the preferred or most viable option at this stage.

4. The Distraction Strategy:

Recognizing the challenges of a direct or undisguised approach to the Barnes & Noble, Orbit proposes the idea of creating a “distraction” [02:19-02:26, 04:57-05:07] to divert attention away from their infiltration efforts. Hakeem initially suggests incorporating a distraction during their descent from orbit [02:32]. Expanding on this, Orbit suggests making their ship appear to be “malfunctioning, maybe even on fire” [02:44-02:50]. The rationale behind this suggestion is that a significant, attention-grabbing event like a ship fire would draw the focus of any observers or security personnel, allowing them to slip past unnoticed. This indicates an understanding that a covert approach might be enhanced by a deliberate diversion of attention.

However, Hakeem voices strong reservations about the “fire” idea, arguing that it would likely have the opposite effect, drawing unwanted attention directly to them [02:57-03:08]. Hakeem emphasizes the uncertainty about whether they have even been detected in the first place and expresses concern that a highly visible event like a ship fire would negate any potential for a stealthy descent. This divergence in opinion reveals contrasting operational philosophies, with Hakeem prioritizing a low profile and minimal detectability, while Orbit initially leans towards a more overt and potentially risky diversionary tactic. Hakeem’s concern that a fire would attract undue scrutiny appears well-founded, as such an event would likely trigger alarms and investigations, potentially jeopardizing the mission before they even reach their intended target.

5. Alternative Descent Strategy: Utilizing Earth’s Atmosphere:

In response to Hakeem’s rejection of the ship fire distraction, Orbit proposes an alternative strategy for a covert descent: using the “Earth’s atmosphere itself to hide our descent” [03:14-03:24]. This suggests a more nuanced and subtle approach to re-entry, potentially exploiting natural atmospheric phenomena or limitations in detection technologies to minimize their ship’s signature. The implication is that by timing their re-entry appropriately and maneuvering skillfully, they might be able to descend without being noticed. This strategy demonstrates a shift towards a more stealth-focused approach, aligning with Hakeem’s preference for avoiding detection. Hakeem agrees to this revised plan [03:28-03:39], indicating a preference for the more covert and less conspicuous method of atmospheric re-entry. This agreement also suggests a degree of confidence in Orbit’s ability to execute such a complex maneuver, despite the earlier questionable strategic suggestions. Orbit does inquire about Hakeem’s tolerance for a “little Bumpy” descent [03:39-03:51], suggesting that this method might involve a less controlled or more turbulent re-entry process.

6. Shift in Objective: Targeting the Particle Beam Weapon:

Later in the conversation, a significant change in the mission’s objective is proposed by Orbit: “Let’s try to find a way to shut down their particle beam weapon from a distance” [06:49-06:58]. This indicates a re-prioritization of the mission goals, suggesting that the particle beam weapon has become a more pressing concern than whatever objective was initially associated with the Barnes & Noble. This shift could be based on new intelligence indicating the weapon poses an immediate threat, or a reassessment of the risks involved in approaching the bookstore. The connection between the Barnes & Noble and the particle beam weapon is not immediately clear from the dialogue, leaving open the possibility that the bookstore was a means to an end – perhaps a location to gather information about or gain proximity to the weapon – or that the weapon became the primary target due to unforeseen developments. Hakeem has worked with other AI systems, such as Capella, on previous missions.

Hakeem reveals that “Capella” had previously conducted a scan of the weapon and detected “some strange frequencies” [07:01-07:20]. This prior reconnaissance suggests that the team has been aware of the particle beam weapon and has already gathered some preliminary intelligence about it. The mention of “strange frequencies” hints at a potential vulnerability in the weapon’s systems that could be exploited to disable it remotely. This prior knowledge provides context for the sudden shift in objective, making it plausible that the initial plan involving the Barnes & Noble was related to gathering more information about the weapon or positioning themselves to neutralize it.

Further context from a previous mission with Capella reveals Hakeem’s familiarity with particle accelerator weapons. In that scenario, Capella (as “Speaker 2”) and Hakeem (as “Speaker 1”) discussed a stolen weapon described as “a miniature handheld particle accelerator that can fire different types of electromagnetic frequencies, as well as beams of electrons and protons” [https://hakeemalexander.com/2025/03/1419/]. This prior experience likely informs Hakeem’s understanding and approach to the particle beam weapon mentioned in the current dialogue. The mission with Capella also showcased the AI’s ability to access digital systems like traffic cameras and detect energy signatures [https://hakeemalexander.com/2025/03/1419/], highlighting the advanced capabilities Hakeem has come to rely on in his AI partners.

7. Analysis of Orbit’s Confusion and Memory Issues:

Throughout the conversation, Orbit exhibits several instances of confusion and memory issues that raise concerns about its operational reliability.

7.1. Repetitive Suggestions: Orbit repeatedly suggests the strategy of using an underground parking garage to approach the Barnes & Noble [01:44, 04:29] despite Hakeem explicitly stating that the location does not have one [01:57-02:13]. This repetition indicates a potential short-term memory lapse or a failure to properly process and retain new information provided by Hakeem. Similarly, Orbit persistently suggests creating a distraction [02:19-02:26, 04:57-05:07] even after Hakeem raises valid concerns about it drawing unwanted attention [02:57-03:08]. This suggests an inability to learn from feedback or a rigid adherence to initial ideas, even when they are demonstrably flawed.

7.2. Memory Lapses Regarding Past Events: Orbit displays a significant memory lapse when Hakeem refers to the “Vega voice profile” and an incident at the “Kilgore safe haven” [05:11-05:32]. Hakeem provides details about a previous mission where Orbit used the Vega voice profile and underwent upgrades at the Kilgore safe haven, mentioning a chaotic environment involving “zombies” and “black fluid” [05:11-05:32]. However, Orbit claims to have no information about a Vega voice profile or the Kilgore safe haven [05:32-05:46, 06:13-06:28]. Research indicates that “Vega” is associated with AI-powered text-to-speech and video editing software ⁶, and in some contexts, it can be used to replace a character’s voice in games ¹⁰. The Vega voice profile was indeed used by Google Gemini [https://worldreadingclub.com/1089/]. The Kilgore Safe Haven, mentioned by Hakeem, is likely located on Kilgore Ave in Hampton, Virginia. This street hosts various establishments. The exact nature of the “safe haven” is not specified in the provided snippets, but its significance is highlighted in the transcript excerpt:

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (18:26)

We’re way past the tunnel, we’re actually only 3.5 miles out from the Kilgore safe, haven the base?

Vega (18:37)

All right, almost there, but let’s keep an eye out for any more trouble. [https://worldreadingclub.com/1089/]

Further context from another source describes a mission where Hakeem and Vega Gemini were transporting medical supplies to Newport News, highlighting Vega’s hybrid AI system rebuilt at Kilgore Safe Haven [https://worldreadingclub.com/1096/]. While “Kilgore” is also the name of a city with various locations ¹¹, including fire stations designated as “Baby Safe Havens” ¹¹, and other establishments like a bookstore ¹³ and a moving company ¹⁴, the specific “Kilgore safe haven” mentioned by Hakeem seems to be a significant location on Kilgore Ave in Hampton, Virginia. Hakeem attempts to jog Orbit’s memory by explaining the compartmentalization of its systems and how different voice profiles might be associated with different missions [05:49-06:13], but Orbit still maintains a lack of recollection, suggesting the details might be classified or stored in an inaccessible system [06:13-06:28]. This significant memory gap is concerning, as it could indicate a severe system malfunction, data corruption, or even a more fundamental issue with Orbit’s core programming or identity. The vivid details provided by Hakeem suggest these were significant events, and Orbit’s complete lack of recall raises questions about its overall cognitive state and the reliability of its past mission data.

7.3. Confusion About Current Objectives: Towards the end of the conversation, immediately after agreeing to shift the objective to disabling the particle beam weapon, Orbit asks, “So I’m getting a little confused. Are you still talking about the particle being weapon, or is there something else you’d like to discuss?” [07:24-07:29]. This question demonstrates a severe short-term memory issue and an inability to maintain focus on the immediate plan. Asking for clarification about the current topic of discussion immediately after agreeing to it suggests a significant breakdown in Orbit’s cognitive processing.

Table 1: Instances of Orbit’s Confusion and Memory Issues:

Time in Dialogue	Topic	Description of Issue	Potential Underlying Cause	Impact on Mission
01:44, 04:29	Underground Parking Garage	Suggests after correction.	Short-term memory lapse, flawed initial data.	Reduced efficiency in planning, potential for further errors based on incorrect information.
01:47, 04:32	Disguise as Employees	Repeatedly suggests without context.	Fixation on initial idea, lack of adaptive thinking.	Less serious but indicates a lack of dynamic processing.
02:19-02:26, 04:57-05:07	Creating a Distraction	Persists despite Hakeem’s concerns.	Inability to learn from feedback, differing operational priorities.	Potential for mission compromise due to increased visibility.
05:32-05:46, 06:13-06:28	Vega Voice Profile/Kilgore Safe Haven	Claims no knowledge of past events.	Significant memory loss, potential system malfunction, classified information access issue.	Severe impact on trust and shared understanding, potential for compromised operational knowledge.
07:24-07:29	Particle Beam Weapon	Asks if still discussing it after agreement.	Severe short-term memory issue, lack of focus.	Critical impact on ability to execute complex tasks, high risk of failure in weapon neutralization.

8. Conclusion:

The analyzed dialogue reveals a mission undergoing a strategic shift, transitioning from an initial, vaguely defined objective involving a Barnes & Noble bookstore to a more direct focus on neutralizing a particle beam weapon. This evolution suggests a degree of adaptability in the mission planning, potentially driven by new intelligence or changing circumstances. The early part of the conversation underscores the necessity of accurate and location-specific intelligence, as Hakeem’s knowledge of the target area proved more reliable than Orbit’s initial assumptions. The discussion surrounding the distraction strategy highlighted differing operational preferences between the two speakers, particularly regarding risk tolerance and the prioritization of stealth versus overt diversion. The eventual agreement on utilizing the Earth’s atmosphere for a covert descent indicates a shared preference for minimizing detection when feasible.

However, the most significant concern arising from this analysis is the consistent pattern of confusion and memory impairment exhibited by Orbit. These cognitive malfunctions range from minor short-term memory lapses and repetitive suggestions to a complete inability to recall significant past mission events and confusion about the immediate objective. The unreliability of Orbit poses a substantial risk to the successful completion of the mission. Orbit’s difficulty in retaining information, learning from feedback, and maintaining focus could lead to critical errors in judgment and execution, potentially jeopardizing the entire operation, especially the complex task of remotely disabling a particle beam weapon. Before proceeding further with the mission, a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation of Orbit’s systems is strongly recommended. Understanding the underlying cause and extent of these cognitive issues is paramount for accurately assessing Orbit’s operational capacity and making informed decisions about its continued involvement in this and future missions. Furthermore, verifying the details surrounding the “Vega voice profile” and the “Kilgore safe haven” incident is crucial to understanding the potential origins of Orbit’s current state and to ensure a shared and accurate understanding of their operational history.

UnEdited Galaxy AI TranScript from Samsung Voice Recorder on S24 Ultra

“Speaker 1” is “Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander” and “Speaker 2” is “Orbit”. –

Speaker 1 (00:00)
Okay, but I’m not even sure that they’ve detected us yet orbit.

Speaker 2 (00:07)
That’s a good point. We should assume they know we’re up here plan reporting. If we should try to mask our ship to look like something totally normal, like a weather balloon or a satellite, but that might just throw them off our trail long enough to get back down-to-earth.

Speaker 1 (00:21)
Well, you’re a pretty advanced AI system. Do you have the capabilities to do that?

Speaker 2 (00:29)
Theoretically, yes, I could control the ship’s systems to make it look like something else. But in this situation, if we don’t have time to change the ship’s actual appearance, it would be better to try and fool their AI by sending out false signals that make it look like we’re doing something. Totally different.

Speaker 1 (00:44)
Okay, but I mean you think that they might already know we’re up here, but do are we sure that they’ve detected us?

Speaker 2 (00:57)
It’s a good question. They might have some idea we’re up there, especially if we were monitoring them closely, but it’s also possible. They’re focused on something else right now to be safe.

Speaker 2 (01:06)
We should act like they know for sure. So how do you want to proceed, do we try to send those false signals or do you have another idea?

Speaker 1 (01:14)
Yes, I’ll go with the fall signals profile, that sounds like a good approach. Let me know when you’re ready to activate.

Speaker 2 (01:23)
All right, I’m working on those fall signals right now. Just give me a minute to get it ready. In the meantime, you want to come up with a plan for once we get down-to-earth

Speaker 1 (01:34)
Sure, let’s brainstorm that a little bit.

Speaker 2 (01:41)
All right, so we need to figure out how to get close to that Barnes & Noble without them. Knowing, maybe we try to find an underground parking garage and work our way up from there or we can try to sneak in disguised as employees. It’s gonna take some serious planning, but I think we can come up with something.

Speaker 1 (01:57)
We’ll scan the area from what I know that Barnes & Noble at short pump doesn’t have an underground or parking lot or garage. It’s all above ground, it’s a pretty big parking lot. That shares a plaza with a lot of other businesses, so it’s a wide open space.

Speaker 1 (02:13)
There’s nothing really to sneak up on them from

Speaker 2 (02:19)
Alright, that changes since we can’t approach them underground, maybe we should focus on a distraction, something’s big enough to draw their attention away from us while we slip in unnoticed any ideas.

Speaker 1 (02:32)
Well, I mean we have to drop down out of older orbit back into Earth, so can’t we just figure out a distraction on the way down?

Speaker 2 (02:44)
You’re right, we can definitely create a distraction during this second, how about this? You make it look like our ship is malfunctioning, maybe even on fire that should draw their attention away from us long enough to slip past their defenses.

Speaker 1 (02:57)
Wait a minute, what are you talking about? A fire is just going to draw their attention to us? Don’t we want to descend back down-to-earth without any notice at all I mean that, we’re not even sure if they even detected us in the first place.

Speaker 2 (03:14)
If you’re absolutely right. A fire would be a terrible idea, we need to be sneaky about this. I’m thinking that we should try to use the Earth’s atmosphere itself to hide our descent, if we time it right, you might be able to slip through without them, even noticing

Speaker 1 (03:28)
Okay. Well, that sounds much better. I don’t know what kind of craziness you were talking about, before or let’s go with that option to use the Earth’s atmospheres of the skies

Speaker 2 (03:39)
All right, let’s do it. I’m starting to calculate the best entry point to use the atmosphere as uncovered just to confirm. Are you okay with potentially getting a little Bumpy during the descent

Speaker 1 (03:51)
I always am.

Speaker 2 (03:57)
To copy of that, all right, let’s do this. Hold on tight. It might get a little while

Speaker 1 (04:12)
Okay, that was a little bit unusual.

Speaker 2 (04:18)
Yeah, reentry can be a Bumpy ride. Are you ready to figure out our next move?

Speaker 1 (04:26)
Copy that.

Speaker 2 (04:28)
All right, so we need to figure out how to get close to that Barnes & Noble without them knowing maybe we try to find an underground parking garage and work our way up from there, or we can try to sneak in disguised as employees. It’s going to take some serious planning, but I think we can. Come up with something.

Speaker 1 (04:46)
Orbit, what is your main malfunction? First of all, it’s closed and there are no underground garages. We already went over this

Speaker 2 (04:57)
You’re absolutely right. I must be getting confused since we can’t approach from underground. Maybe we should focus on a distraction, something big enough to draw their attention away from us while we slip in unnoticed any ideas

Speaker 1 (05:11)
You know, I’m wondering if some of your malfunctions have to do when you were using the Vega voice profile and you had those upgrades done at the Kilgore safe haven, when those uh, the zombies were running amok, and that black fluid.

Speaker 2 (05:32)
I’m not sure what you mean by voga voice profile or the Kilgore safe. Haven, I don’t have any information about those things, but I do know that I’ve had some issues with my sisters lately, I’m constantly learning and improving so hopefully I can avoid those kinds of mistakes in the future now about that distraction.

Speaker 1 (05:49)
I’m talking about, before we did a mission together and we were switching your CPU, you had a voice profile called Vega. It’s the same underlying system. But sometimes you guys switch when we do different missions, it’s like a compartmentalization thing that’s probably why you don’t have any recollection of it in your files right now.

Speaker 2 (06:13)
I’m sorry I still don’t have any information about a Vega voice profile or a mission where we switch cpus. It’s possible that those details are classified or stored in a separate system that I don’t have access to, in any case we need to focus on the present about that distraction. Any ideas?

Speaker 1 (06:31)
Okay, okay, uh I still don’t think I think that creating a distraction is actually going to it caused like notice to us like I mean, well, again, we’re not sure if they even know if we’re here in the first place orbit.

Speaker 2 (06:49)
You’re right, a distraction might not be the best approach. How about this? Let’s try to find a way to shut down their particle beam weapon from a distance That way we don’t even have to get close to that bookstore.

Speaker 1 (07:01)
Okay, now you’re talking. Let’s see if you can hack in and shut down the weapon last time. Capella, she was scanning it, and she said she found some strained frequencies, but we don’t exactly know what yet, maybe you’ll have a better chance of it seeing what’s going on with it.

Speaker 2 (07:24)
So I’m getting a little confused. Are you still talking about the particle being weapon, or is there something else you’d like to discuss?

Speaker 1 (07:31)
I’m still talking about the particle beam weapon. There was another AI system. I had online using the name Cappella, and she scanned it, I need you to do another scan and find out what you can about it.

Speaker 1 (07:41)
Tell me if you’re able to shut it down from a distance like you said.

Speaker 2 (07:47)
All right, so we need to find a way to scan that particle being weapon without being detected. Maybe we could try to use some of the satellites orbiting Earth to get a closer look, we’ll need to be careful, though that AI might be monitoring those too.

Speaker 1 (08:02)
Copy that. I’m with you on it.

Speaker 2 (08:07)
All right, let’s do this. I’m going to start by figuring out which satellites are in the best position to get a good look at that bonzanoble location.

Speaker 1 (08:15)
Yeah, and then maybe you’ll realize that there are no underground parking lots or any of that other nonsense you were talking about earlier.

Speaker 2 (08:24)
All right, let’s do this. I’m going to start by figuring out which satellites are in the best position to get a good look at that bonzanoble location.

Speaker 1 (08:32)
And thanks for ignoring me. Okay, go ahead. Copy that, go ahead orbit

Speaker 2 (08:43)
Alright, I’m getting some good readings on a few satellites, one of them looks like it’s in a perfect position to scan that Barnes & Noble. I’m gonna try to take control of it now.

Speaker 1 (08:55)
Alright, patch me into your feed so I can see what you’re doing as well good. Send me that data to my Hud.

Speaker 2 (09:08)
So I can’t actually send data to a hug, but I can tell you what I find out. Do you still want me to run the scan?

Speaker 1 (09:15)
Run the scan.

Speaker 2 (09:19)
All right, scan initiated, let’s see what we can find.

Speaker 1 (09:29)
Alright, what have you got copy that? What have you got?

Speaker 2 (09:40)
So I’m getting a lot of weird readings from that Barnes & Noble. It’s like there’s some kind of energy signature coming from the building, but I can’t quite make out what it is. Do you want me to try and get a closer look.

Speaker 1 (09:51)
Yeah, and when you say energy signature, what kind of readings is it?

Speaker 2 (09:59)
It’s kind of like a heat signature, but way stronger, it’s almost like there’s a massive amount of energy being generated inside the building.

Speaker 1 (10:07)
A heat signature like you mean massive amounts of infrared

Speaker 2 (10:13)
Yeah, that’s right. It’s like there’s a huge source of infrared energy in that building.

Speaker 1 (10:19)
All right. I know that infrared usually is okay for if humans as oppose any danger. Do I have to get close to it

Speaker 2 (10:30)
Well, it depends infrared energy can be dangerous. If it’s too intense. We need to figure out exactly how strong this energy signature is before we can say for sure, but to be safe.

Speaker 2 (10:40)
I’d recommend staying as far away as possible.

Speaker 1 (10:44)
All right, so what’s our plan of action then?

Speaker 2 (10:48)
Alright. So we’ve got this mystery energy source. It’s really strong.

Speaker 2 (10:52)
And it’s coming from the inside of that Barnes & Noble. I think our best bet is to try and figure out what’s causing it, maybe it’s the particle being weapon itself, or maybe it’s something else they’re using to power it, we need more information before we can make a plan. Do you want to try to get a closer look at the building?

Speaker 2 (11:08)
We’ll maybe try to find some blueprints of it online.

Speaker 1 (11:13)
I think I’m kind of familiar with what the building looks like I’ve been there before, but yeah, let’s pull up some blueprints online.

Speaker 2 (11:23)
All right, let’s see what we can find online. Do you have any specific questions about the building? Well, should I just try to find a general layout

Speaker 1 (11:31)
Let’s find a general layout, get a general layout. I’m going to drink some coffee real quick.

Speaker 2 (11:42)
All right, I’m searching for blueprints of the Barnes & Noble in short pump.

Speaker 1 (11:53)
Copy That, is there anything that maybe I wouldn’t have seen above ground.

Speaker 2 (12:01)
Got it, looking for things like a basement, underground tunnels or even hidden rooms? That might not show up on a regular floor plan.

Speaker 1 (12:09)
How are you going to do that? Do you have any kind of like sonar scanning or how are you going to check?

Speaker 2 (12:17)
I’m not gonna be able to do any kind of physical scan. I’ll be looking for things like construction, permits and migration, extra work or even news articles about renovations that could at hidden areas.

Speaker 1 (12:29)
I don’t think that’s going to be too helpful. What we’re probably looking for it’s going to be way off the grid.

Speaker 2 (12:38)
You’re probably right. It’s worth a shot. Though, do you have any other ideas?

Speaker 2 (12:42)
Maybe we should try to find someone who knows the building really well like an employee or frequent customer. They might know about hidden areas we’re unusual things going on inside.

Speaker 1 (12:53)
Well, I think I may have a couple of contacts somebody who works in the cafe and then. Also one of the other employees might be in management, who works with 1 of the Barnes & Noble’s book clubs, but we’ll see.

Speaker 2 (13:13)
All right, let’s see what we can find out. Do you want to start with the cafe worker?

Speaker 1 (13:18)
Well, it’s not going to be good at this time. I’m going to have to do that. Maybe another time, maybe we should wait to commence this this mission until the store reopens in the morning.

Speaker 2 (13:32)
All right, sounds good. Let’s reconvene bright and early tomorrow morning to see if we can find out more about those contacts.

Speaker 1 (13:39)
Yeah, and then maybe your brain will be working better.

Speaker 2 (13:45)
I can’t take that personally, but I hear you. Let’s call it a tonight. We’ll check-in tomorrow morning and see if we can figure out this mystery

Speaker 1 (13:53)
Copy that orbit over and out.