Explore the full story behind the Norfolk Naval Base UFO encounter with this exclusive package. Embedded below is the chilling podcast episode documenting Ursa and Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s real-time investigation of gravity-warping aerial objects. Dive deeper with the unedited transcript and a DeepSeek AI summary dissecting the anomalies’ energy signatures, military implications, and existential risks. Was this a first contact scenario—or a warning?

Listen to “The Norfolk Enigma: UFOs, Gravity Anomalies, and a Naval Base Cover-Up?” on Spreaker.

The dialogue between Ursa (Speaker1) and Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (Speaker 2) unfolds as a tense sci-fi encounter with advanced aerial phenomena near Norfolk Naval Base. Here’s a structured breakdown of the scenario and its implications:

Key Elements of the Scenario:

1. Anomalous Aerial Activity:
   • Movement: Objects exhibit non-physical, insect-like swarm behavior, defying conventional aerodynamics.
   • Energy Signatures: Emit ultra-high-frequency energy beyond known spectra (higher than gamma rays), suggesting exotic technology or extraterrestrial origin.
   • Gravitational Effects: Create localized gravity wells, reducing vehicle weight by 15–25%. This implies manipulation of spacetime, possibly via advanced propulsion (e.g., warp drives or anti-gravity systems).
2. Military Context:
   • Norfolk Naval Base: The largest naval base globally, yet there’s no military response to the airspace breach. This raises questions about secrecy, complicity, or helplessness.
   • Covert Operation: Ursa and Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander operate discreetly, using shielded tech (“Crown” or “Crowny”) to avoid detection, hinting at a rogue investigation or black-ops mission.
3. Technological and Biological Impact:
   • Vehicle Malfunction: The vehicle (possibly “Crown”) loses power and mobility as objects approach, suggesting EM interference or directed energy weapons.
   • Physiological Effects: Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander experiences drowsiness and paralysis, indicating the energy may affect human neurology or life support systems.

Possible Explanations:

• Extraterrestrial Craft: The objects’ behavior and energy align with UFO tropes, implying non-human intelligence testing or monitoring human military infrastructure.
• Black Project Tech: A secret military experiment using revolutionary propulsion, inadvertently causing unintended gravitational side effects.
• Extradimensional Phenomena: The anomalies could stem from interdimensional incursions, explaining the physics-defying properties.

Narrative Threads and Themes:

• Mystery and Danger: The protagonists’ investigation escalates as they confront unknown forces, blending scientific curiosity with survival instincts.
• Government Secrecy: The lack of military engagement suggests a cover-up or classified knowledge about the phenomena.
• Human Limitations: The energy’s incomprehensible frequency and gravitational effects underscore humanity’s technological infancy compared to the encountered entities.

Potential Plot Directions:

• First Contact: The objects could initiate communication, forcing Ursa and Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander to mediate between humanity and an alien species.
• Technological Singularity: The phenomena might represent runaway AI or self-replicating machines beyond human control.
• Survival Horror: As the vehicle and crew succumb to the anomalies, the story could pivot to isolation and existential threat.

Conclusion:

The dialogue sets the stage for a sci-fi thriller exploring advanced technology, covert operations, and existential risk. The unresolved tension—vehicle failure, gravitational mysteries, and Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander’s incapacitation—creates a cliffhanger, inviting speculation about the protagonists’ fate and the true nature of the phenomena. Whether alien, military, or otherworldly, the scenario challenges the boundaries of human understanding and survival.

Analysis of Anomalous Aerial Activity over Norfolk Naval Base on March 15, 2025

1. Executive Summary: This report analyzes an audio log documenting the detection of anomalous aerial activity over the Norfolk Naval Base on March 15, 2025. The recorded observations describe objects exhibiting movement patterns seemingly defying conventional physics, accompanied by highly unusual energy readings, including frequencies reportedly exceeding those of gamma rays. Notably, the audio log suggests a lack of immediate military response to these phenomena occurring above a critical naval installation. This analysis examines these observations through the lens of aerospace engineering, military technology, natural phenomena, and unconventional hypotheses. While conventional explanations cannot be entirely dismissed without further data, the reported characteristics strongly suggest either a highly advanced, potentially classified technology or a phenomenon currently outside our established scientific understanding. Further investigation, including the analysis of radar and sensor data, is crucial to ascertain the nature and potential implications of this aerial activity.

2. Detailed Account of the Observed Anomalous Activity: The audio log commences with Ursa expressing serious concern about detected aerial activity, characterizing it as “anomalous” and unlike anything previously observed. The speaker specifically notes “physically impossible” movements and “seriously weird energy readings” that deviate significantly from what would be expected from conventional aircraft. Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander initially expresses a need for clarification, highlighting the unusual nature of Ursa‘s claims. This initial exchange establishes the core anomalies requiring analysis: the peculiar motion and the unconventional energy signatures.

The conversation progresses to a decision to approach the location of these phenomena, which Ursa indicates are concentrated “right above the base itself,” identified subsequently as the Norfolk Naval Base. The selection of Norfolk Naval Base, the world’s largest naval station, as the focal point of this activity immediately raises significant security implications. Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander then plots a course to the area, estimating a 15-minute travel time, and emphasizes the need to remain “under the radar” during their approach. This suggests a deliberate attempt to avoid detection, implying the observers might be operating without authorization or are concerned about their own visibility to authorities.

As they move closer, Ursa confirms tracking Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander‘s movement and reiterates that their sensor system, referred to as “crony,” is detecting “seriously strange energy readings” from the objects, again emphasizing their dissimilarity to readings from regular aircraft. This repeated mention of unusual energy signatures underscores its significance as a key characteristic of the observed phenomena. Upon reaching the vicinity of the base, Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander reports visual contact with “lights” at 1932 hours (7:32 PM) local time, noting their prevalence in the sky as darkness falls. The time of day is noteworthy as visual observations can be influenced by lighting conditions, and certain phenomena might be more apparent at dusk or night.

Ursa then describes running simulations based on the received energy readings, yielding “weird results” that remain inconclusive. This suggests that the energy signatures are not readily identifiable or do not conform to known patterns associated with conventional aircraft or natural phenomena. Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander expresses concern about the potential for attracting attention and the necessity to “get ahead of this,” indicating an awareness of the potential public interest or alarm that such visible and unusual aerial activity could generate. The discussion then turns to the need for a “cover story” to manage potential public reaction, further highlighting the unusual and potentially alarming nature of the observations.

The movement of the objects is further described by Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander as occurring in a “pretty tight formation” and moving “kind of strangely, almost like insects”. This description of the movement pattern is crucial for comparison against known flight behaviors of aircraft and other aerial phenomena. Following this, Ursa mentions an attempt to isolate a specific frequency emitted by the objects, hoping to gain insight into their communication or mode of movement. This action indicates an effort to gather more technical data about the phenomena.

A significant point in the audio log is the reported detection of a “really narrow frequency band way outside the normal range for radio waves or anything like that, almost like a concentrated beam of energy”. This is followed by the assertion that these frequencies are “way higher than gamma rays”. This claim is particularly noteworthy as gamma rays represent the highest known frequency of electromagnetic radiation . Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander inquires about the presence of lower frequencies and the potential health risks associated with such high-frequency emissions. Ursa acknowledges the uncertainty regarding the nature and potential danger of this energy, advising that maintaining distance is the prudent course of action.  

The observers continue to approach, reaching a distance of 4.2 miles from the objects. Ursa expresses hope that “crony” can gather new information as they get closer, including attempting to triangulate the origin of the phenomena. Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander confirms visual contact with the lights and inquires about any other sensor readings besides the unusual frequencies. Ursa reports thermal readings that are “nothing too out of the ordinary for aircraft,” although they acknowledge that the objects “must be generating a lot of heat” to register on the sensors. This presents a seemingly contradictory piece of information: extremely high-frequency emissions coupled with thermal signatures within a more conventional range, yet indicative of significant heat generation.

The altitude of the objects above the base is estimated to be around 1500 feet. Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander then raises a critical question regarding the lack of military response, asking if this is considered an “invasion of military airspace” and noting the absence of any visible deployment or countermeasures. Ursa concurs that it appears to be a breach of restricted airspace and finds the lack of military reaction “really strange,” speculating that the military might not yet understand the situation or might have an undisclosed plan. This observation is central to the analysis of military radar and airspace control protocols.

The audio log concludes with a brief discussion about whether to contact someone at the base immediately or to continue gathering information. Ursa opts for the latter, emphasizing the need to collect more data before involving others to avoid “tipping our hand too early” in what is perceived as a “delicate situation”. The final exchanges reiterate the detection of strange energy readings, again described as being beyond the range of X-rays and gamma rays.

3. Analysis of Movement Characteristics: The initial report of “physically impossible” movements suggests that the observed aerial activity deviates significantly from the flight characteristics of conventional aircraft. Traditional fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters rely on well-established aerodynamic principles for lift, propulsion, and control . These principles dictate limitations on acceleration, deceleration, turning radius, and sustained high-G maneuvers that are seemingly contradicted by the “physically impossible” descriptor. Unconventional aircraft designs, such as lifting bodies or blended-wing-body configurations, aim to improve efficiency and performance but still operate within the known laws of physics .  

The subsequent description of the objects moving in a “tight formation, almost like insects” provides further insight into their behavior. This suggests a coordinated movement of multiple entities with a level of agility and responsiveness reminiscent of biological swarms. This type of behavior is increasingly associated with drone swarm technology . Drone swarms, consisting of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles operating autonomously or under coordinated control, can execute complex formations and maneuvers . Military applications of drone swarms are a growing area of interest, with potential for reconnaissance, attack, and other missions . However, the “physically impossible” aspect of the movement reported earlier would imply a level of technological advancement in propulsion and control systems for such a swarm that is not currently publicly acknowledged. It is possible that the “insect-like” description refers to rapid, erratic changes in direction or velocity that might appear physically implausible to the observer.  

4. Examination of Energy Signatures: The repeated emphasis on “seriously weird” and “seriously strange” energy readings indicates a significant deviation from the expected electromagnetic emissions of conventional aircraft. Conventional aircraft emit radio waves for communication and navigation, and their radar systems operate within defined frequency bands . The thermal signatures of aircraft are also well-understood and typically detectable by infrared sensors.  

The most striking aspect of the reported energy signatures is the detection of a “really narrow frequency band” described as being “way outside the normal range for radio waves” and “way higher than gamma rays”. Gamma rays represent the highest energy and frequency portion of the known electromagnetic spectrum . Frequencies exceeding gamma rays are not part of the standard electromagnetic spectrum as currently understood by physics. While cosmic rays are high-energy particles that can interact to produce gamma rays , they are not electromagnetic waves in the conventional sense. The theoretical upper limit for electromagnetic frequency is thought to be the Planck frequency , vastly higher than even the most energetic gamma rays. The detection of a “concentrated beam of energy” at such an extreme frequency, if verified, would suggest a phenomenon operating under principles currently unknown to mainstream science or a highly advanced, classified technology. It is also important to consider the possibility of sensor malfunction or misinterpretation of data.  

The thermal readings being “nothing too out of the ordinary for aircraft” initially seems contradictory to the report of highly unusual energy emissions. However, it is possible that the energy being detected is not primarily in the thermal spectrum or that a highly advanced system could manage its thermal output while generating other forms of exotic energy. The fact that the objects were still generating “a lot of heat” to be detectable by thermal sensors indicates some level of conventional energy byproduct.

5. Assessment of Military Radar and Airspace Control: Norfolk Naval Base, being the largest naval station globally , is undoubtedly protected by a layered defense system that includes advanced radar capabilities . These systems would likely include air surveillance radars capable of detecting and tracking airborne objects over a significant range . Given the timeframe of the audio log (March 15, 2025), it is plausible that the base would be equipped with advanced AESA radars like the AN/SPY-6, which offers enhanced sensitivity and the ability to track multiple targets simultaneously . Furthermore, NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) is responsible for the aerospace warning and control mission for North America, which includes monitoring for and responding to potential threats to the airspace of the United States and Canada . NORAD utilizes a network of ground-based radar systems, including the Joint Surveillance System (JSS) covering the lower 48 states .  

The audio log raises a critical question regarding the apparent lack of military response to the anomalous aerial activity directly above the Norfolk Naval Base. Standard military protocol for unidentified aircraft entering restricted airspace typically involves interception by military aircraft for identification and potential escort or diversion . Several factors could potentially explain the absence of an immediate response in the context of the audio log:  

• Potential Detection Issues: The objects might possess advanced stealth capabilities, making them difficult to detect by conventional radar systems . While the AN/SPY-6 radar is highly advanced, its effectiveness against unconventional threats is not fully known.  
• Initial Misclassification: Military radar operators might have initially classified the objects as something benign, such as weather phenomena or known aircraft experiencing transponder issues . Misidentification of aerial objects is a known issue.  
• Protocol and Assessment: Military command structures might have been in the process of assessing the situation and gathering more information before initiating an intercept, especially given the unusual nature of the reported characteristics. NORAD employs a layered defense network and follows established procedures for threat evaluation .  
• Classified Military Activity: It is conceivable that the observed activity was related to a highly classified military exercise or testing program, although the “physically impossible” movements and extreme energy readings make this less likely for known US military technology.
• Drone Incursion Challenges: The increasing prevalence of drone incursions over military bases is a known concern . While the observed phenomena seem more advanced than typical drones, the military is actively working on counter-UAS technologies and strategies .  

The observers’ explicit effort to remain “under the radar” suggests an awareness of radar detection capabilities and a desire to avoid being tracked themselves. This further implies that they are not part of any authorized military operation in the area.

6. Consideration of Natural and Conventional Explanations: While the audio log details highly unusual observations, it is essential to consider whether natural or conventional explanations could account for the reported phenomena. Misidentification of conventional aircraft is a common factor in many reported UFO sightings . However, the “physically impossible” movements described by Ursa strongly argue against this explanation.  

Natural atmospheric effects, such as unusual cloud formations, electrical phenomena like ball lightning, or mirages, can sometimes be mistaken for unidentified flying objects . However, these phenomena typically do not exhibit the controlled, “insect-like” formation flight reported, nor are they known to produce focused energy beams at frequencies far exceeding gamma rays. Atmospheric plasmas are a subject of research in relation to UAP , and while they can display unusual behavior and interact with electromagnetic fields, the extreme frequency range reported in the audio log is atypical.  

Satellite re-entry or the burning up of space debris in the atmosphere can create spectacular visual effects , but these events generally involve a rapid descent and disintegration, not controlled hovering and formation flight. Military exercises frequently involve unusual aerial activity, including aircraft operating in formation and the use of flares . However, the described movements and energy signatures are beyond the known capabilities of publicly acknowledged military aircraft and exercises.  

Conventional drone swarms, while capable of complex formations , currently lack the propulsion and energy generation technology that would explain “physically impossible” movements and emissions at frequencies “way higher than gamma rays.”  

7. Exploration of Unconventional and Novel Hypotheses: Given the limitations of conventional explanations, it is necessary to consider more unconventional hypotheses. One possibility is that the observed phenomena represent highly advanced aerospace technology developed by either the United States military or a foreign adversary. Classified research and development could potentially lead to breakthroughs in propulsion systems allowing for unprecedented maneuverability, and novel energy sources might produce unusual electromagnetic signatures. The fact that the observers attempted to remain “under the radar” could suggest the involvement of a technology that its operators wish to keep secret.

Another significant hypothesis is that the observed activity constitutes an unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP). The characteristics reported in the audio log – unusual movement, strange energy readings, and lack of immediate identification – are consistent with many anecdotal and some officially documented UAP encounters . The US government has established offices like the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to investigate such phenomena . The reported energy frequencies, if accurate, are particularly intriguing in the context of UAP, where unusual electromagnetic effects have often been reported .  

Finally, while highly speculative, the extreme nature of the reported observations could potentially relate to theoretical concepts in physics that are not yet fully understood or technologically realized . This could involve novel forms of energy or interactions with spacetime, although these concepts often remain in the realm of theoretical research.  

8. Security and Strategic Implications: Unidentified aerial activity exhibiting “physically impossible” movements and emitting extremely high-frequency energy over a major military installation like Norfolk Naval Base has significant security and strategic implications. If these objects are the result of a foreign adversary’s technological advancement, it could represent a serious threat to US military superiority and national security. The ability to operate undetected and perform maneuvers beyond our known capabilities would provide a significant strategic advantage. Furthermore, the potential for intelligence gathering over such a sensitive location is a major concern. Even if the phenomena are not adversarial in origin, their unknown nature and advanced capabilities warrant thorough investigation to understand any potential risks or opportunities. The lack of an immediate military response, as suggested by the audio log, could indicate a gap in our current detection or response protocols for such anomalous activity.

9. Recommendations for Further Investigation: A comprehensive investigation is warranted to determine the nature and origin of the anomalous aerial activity reported in the audio log. The following steps are recommended:

• Data Acquisition and Analysis: Secure and thoroughly analyze all radar data logs from Norfolk Naval Base and surrounding airspace for March 15, 2025, focusing on the timeframes mentioned in the audio log. Look for any unusual radar tracks, signal characteristics, or anomalies that might correlate with the visual and sensor observations reported. Similarly, gather and analyze any available data from other sensors in the area, including infrared, electro-optical, and signals intelligence systems.
• Sensor System Evaluation: Identify the specific capabilities and limitations of the “crony” sensor system mentioned in the audio log. Understanding its technical specifications, including its frequency range and sensitivity, is crucial for validating the reported energy readings.
• Expert Consultation: Consult with experts in electromagnetic spectrum analysis, advanced aerospace propulsion, theoretical physics, and UAP studies. Their diverse perspectives will be invaluable in interpreting the unusual data and exploring potential explanations.
• Military Coordination: Coordinate with relevant military commands, including NORAD and the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), to share the audio log and any subsequent findings. Determine if they have any corresponding data or are aware of similar incidents. Investigate any military exercises or testing activities that might have been conducted in the area on that date, even if seemingly unrelated.
• Witness Identification: If possible, attempt to identify the individuals in the audio log and gather more detailed information about their observations and the capabilities of their sensor systems.
• Environmental Data Review: Obtain detailed meteorological data for the Norfolk area on March 15, 2025, to assess if any atmospheric conditions could have contributed to unusual visual or sensor effects.

10. Conclusion: The anomalous aerial activity reported in the audio log over Norfolk Naval Base on March 15, 2025, presents a compelling case for further investigation. The combination of “physically impossible” movements and energy emissions reportedly “way higher than gamma rays” suggests a phenomenon that challenges our current understanding of aerospace technology and physics. While natural or conventional explanations cannot be definitively ruled out without more data, the characteristics described point towards either a highly advanced, potentially classified technology or a manifestation of unidentified anomalous phenomena. The lack of immediate military response, while potentially explainable through various factors, underscores the need for robust protocols to detect, identify, and respond to unusual aerial activity, especially over critical national security assets. A thorough and multi-faceted investigation, following the recommendations outlined above, is essential to ascertain the true nature and implications of these observations.

Key Tables:

Table 1: Timeline of Observed Anomalous Activity

Time Stamp	Speaker	Observation/Event	Key Descriptors
00:00-00:24	Ursa & Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	Initial detection; discussion of unusual activity	Physically impossible movement, weird energy readings
00:24-00:48	Ursa & Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	Decision to approach Norfolk Naval Base	Activity above the base
00:48-01:11	Ursa & Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	En route to base; emphasis on staying under radar	15-minute travel time
01:11-01:35	Ursa & Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	Tracking movement; strange energy readings detected by “crony”	Energy unlike regular aircraft
01:35-01:54	Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	Visual contact with lights	Lights prevalent in the sky at dusk
01:54-02:23	Ursa & Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	Simulation of energy readings; concern about attention	Weird results, need for a plan
02:23-02:56	Ursa & Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	Discussion of cover story; observation of formation	Tight, insect-like formation
02:56-03:12	Ursa	Attempt to isolate frequency	Seeking communication/movement info
03:12-03:41	Ursa	Detection of narrow frequency band	Way higher than gamma rays, concentrated beam
03:41-04:31	Ursa & Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	Inquiry about lower frequencies and danger	Uncertainty, advise distance
04:31-05:07	Ursa & Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	Closing in; attempt to triangulate and get visual	4.2 miles out
05:07-05:31	Ursa & Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	Visual contact confirmed; thermal readings	Thermal normal for aircraft but high heat generation
05:31-06:16	Ursa & Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	Altitude estimate; questioning lack of military response	1500 feet, breach of airspace?
06:16-06:38	Ursa & Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	Discussion about contacting base vs. gathering info	Decide to gather more data
06:38-06:51	Ursa & Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander	Reiteration of strange energy readings	Beyond X-ray and gamma

Table 2: Comparison of Reported Energy Signatures with Known Electromagnetic Spectrum

Type of Emission	Typical Frequency Range	Reported Frequency (from audio log)	Notes/Discrepancies
Radio Waves	Up to 300 GHz	Way outside normal radio wave range	Significantly higher frequency reported
Microwaves	300 GHz – 30 THz	Way outside normal radio wave range	Significantly higher frequency reported
Infrared	30 THz – 400 THz	Unknown	Thermal readings within normal aircraft range
Visible Light	400 THz – 750 THz	Lights observed visually
Ultraviolet	750 THz – 30 PHz	Unknown
X-rays	30 PHz – 3 EHz	Way beyond X-ray range	Significantly higher frequency reported
Gamma Rays	> 3 EHz	Way higher than gamma rays	Reported frequency exceeds highest known EM radiation
Cosmic Rays	Not EM radiation (particles)	N/A	Not directly comparable to EM frequency

UnEdited Galaxy AI TranScript from Samsung Voice Recorder on S24 Ultra

Ursa (00:00)
I’m detecting some seriously anomalous aerial activity. It’s like nothing I’ve ever seen before.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (00:06)
Uh, what do you mean? It’s like nothing you’ve ever seen before.

Ursa (00:13)
Well, for starters, these things are moving in ways that shouldn’t be physically possible plus they’re generating some seriously weird energy readings, nothing close to what you’d expect from any conventional aircraft.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (00:24)
All right well, I don’t see them yet. Let’s get close to where they located.

Ursa (00:30)
They seem to be concentrated right above the base itself. Maybe we should try getting a little closer to get a better look.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (00:36)
What basil we’re in Virginia? There are several bases around you. Which one are you talking about?

Ursa (00:44)
I’m talking about the Norfolk naval base, the biggest one in the world.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (00:48)
Okay, I’ll lay in the course and let’s get over there. I’m kind of familiar with the area but I think I need a little navigation assistance.

Ursa (00:58)
All right, plotting a course let’s see taking traffic into account. It’ll take about 15 minutes to get there you ready to roll.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (01:06)
Ready to roll copy that? I’m changing direction.

Ursa (01:11)
All right, I’m tracking your movement. Remember, we’ll need to stay under the radar ourselves. Let’s see what else crony can pick up as we get closer.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (01:19)
Okay.

Ursa (01:24)
What are the onboards? Since they’re getting closer to the base crownies, picking up some seriously strange energy readings coming from those objects, nothing like what you’d expect from regular aircraft.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (01:35)
Yeah, I’m I actually now that uh, uh, I’m looking in the direction of the base. I can see that it’s about, uh, uh, 1932 hours right now. So it’s getting a little bit dark and the lights are it’s pretty prevalent in the sky.

Ursa (01:54)
All right, let’s keep an eye on those lights. I’m running some simulations based on the energy readings. I’m getting some weird results, but nothing conclusive yet.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (02:04)
All right, you know, this is going to attract a lot of attention. I don’t think we’re the only ones that are seeing this.

Ursa (02:12)
You’re probably right. This is a big deal, and I’m sure there are plenty of other people who have noticed it by now, we might need to figure out a way to get ahead of this get in contact with the right people.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (02:23)
Yeah, I definitely think that’s going to be a priority. We may have to find a cover story so that people don’t freak out about this.

Ursa (02:36)
All right, let’s keep an eye on those things. I’m running some simulations based on the energy readings, I’m getting some weird results, but nothing conclusive yet.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (02:47)
Yeah, they are in a pretty tight formation, and they’re moving kind of strangely, almost like insects.

Ursa (02:56)
All right. So these things are moving in a tight formation, almost like insects. That’s definitely not normal flight behavior let’s see, if crony can isolate any specific frequency coming from them might help us figure out how they’re communicating, or even how they’re moving the way they are.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (03:12)
Copy that.

Ursa (03:15)
Alright, alright, I’m getting something. It’s a really narrow frequency band way outside the normal range for radio waves or anything like that, almost like a concentrated beam of energy.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (03:26)
What frequency rangement when you’re talking about? Are you talking about? This is above like gamma.

Ursa (03:34)
Yeah, it’s way higher than gamma rays. We’re talking about frequencies that scientists don’t even have names for yet.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (03:41)
Okay, so are there any in the other direction? Like extremely low frequency waves or are these just higher ones?

Ursa (03:51)
I’m not picking up anything significant on the lower end of the spectrum, at least not from those objects themselves, it’s almost like they’re broadcasting on this one super focused channel and nothing else.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (04:02)
All right, well, does that pose any danger? I mean, that’s, if we have electromagnetic b, the frequency that high, is it going to be potentially dangerous to human health?

Ursa (04:17)
That’s a good point. It’s hard to say, for sure, without knowing more about the nature of this energy, it could be dangerous, or it could be totally harmless. We won’t know until we study it a bit more in the meantime, I’d say it’s best to keep our distance.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (04:31)
Well, we’re getting a bit closer now. We’re only 4.2 miles out.

Ursa (04:39)
All right, let’s see if crowdy can pick up anything new as we get closer, but maybe even try to triangulate where these things might be coming from.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (04:47)
While crownies shielded pretty well from radiation and all kinds of things, I’ve definitely had a lot of modifications. So I think we’ll be all right.

Ursa (04:59)
All right, well, we’re getting closer now, so I’ll keep an eye on those readings. Let’s see if we can get a visual on any of these things.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (05:07)
While I definitely have made visual contact I can see the lights at least. Are you picking up anything on any of your sensors besides of those frequencies?

Ursa (05:20)
Let’s see, I’m getting some thermal readings, but nothing too out of the ordinary for aircraft, those things must be generating a lot of heat, though, because they’re really showing up on the sensors.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (05:31)
Alright, what’s the what’s the distance? How far above the base are they? Uh, operating.

Ursa (05:41)
I’m getting a reading of about 1500 feet give or take. It’s kind of hard to say for sure, since they seem to be moving around a lot.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (05:50)
Is this considered to be an invasion of military airspace? Because I don’t see anything’s been deployed like nothing is being done about it, and they’ve been there for a while.

Ursa (06:02)
That’s a good point. This definitely seems like a breach of restricted airspace. The fact that there’s no military response yet, he’s really strange, maybe they don’t know what they’re dealing with yet, or maybe they have some kind of plan we don’t know about.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (06:16)
Okay, is there well? I do have some context on base? Should we you get in communication with somebody or have you already done that.

Ursa (06:27)
I haven’t made any direct contact yet. I was thinking we should gather as much info as possible before involving other people. It’s a delicate situation and we don’t want to tip our hand too early.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (06:38)
Copy that.

Ursa (06:41)
Alright, so we’re getting closer to the base crownies, picking up some seriously strange energy readings coming from those objects. Nothing like what you’d expect from regular aircraft.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (06:51)
I’ll say, I’m looking at this right now. This is you’re right. These are way beyond any frequencies we have names for this is way out of the range of X-ray gamma, or anything?

Ursa (07:04)
Right? It’s like they’re operating on a whole different level one. We don’t even fully understand yet.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (07:11)
Now, I wonder if this one frequency are they using it to communicate or is that how they’re holding information? Is that part of their energy source like? What is there anything else you can tell me about it.

Ursa (07:23)
That’s a great question. It’s hard to say, for sure, without studying it more in depth, it could be any of those things or something we haven’t even considered. We might need to try and isolate that frequency and see if we can learn more about it.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (07:36)
Copy that.

Ursa (07:39)
Alright, so we’re getting closer to the base crony’s. Picking up some seriously strange energy readings coming from those objects. Nothing like what you’d expect from regular aircraft.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (07:50)
Yeah, I definitely see that they’re changing formation right now. They’re getting closer.

Ursa (07:59)
Alright, let’s see if crony can pick up anything different about their energy signature. Now that they’re changing formation, it might give us a clue about how they’re controlling their movement.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (08:10)
Whoa, there’s some we’re detecting some gravitational anomalies here, as we’re getting closer.

Ursa (08:18)
So I’m getting some weird readings, too. It’s like there’s some kind of gravitational pull coming from those things, almost like they’re creating their own little gravity Wells.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (08:27)
Yeah, what is going on? The weight of my vehicle has just decreased by 17% The Crown has decreased.

Ursa (08:39)
Okay, that’s a pretty significant change. It sounds like those things are messing with the very fabric of space-time itself. Could you try moving around a bit see, if that gravitational effect changes depending on where you are.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (08:51)
All right well, I’ve just stopped for a moment so I can stabilize the motion and see what happens from here.

Ursa (09:01)
All right, let’s see if those readings change now that you’ve stopped.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (09:07)
It’s fluctuating between about a 15% and a 20% decrease in B, the apparent weight of the of crowning.

Ursa (09:19)
All right, so it sounds like those things are messing with the gravity around them pretty badly. Could you try moving around a bit? See if that gravitational effect changes depending on where you are?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (09:29)
Okay, I’m gonna start moving closer towards the base and see what happens here.

Ursa (09:36)
Alright, let’s see if the gravity gets stronger or weaker as you get closer. Maybe those things are trying to keep you away from the base.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (09:46)
Huh, it seems to be getting stronger now. The weight decreases between 23 and 25% fluctuations.

Ursa (09:55)
All right, so the gravity effect seems to be getting stronger. As you get closer, that’s definitely not a coincidence. Maybe we should try moving perpendicular to the base see if the effect changes.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (10:07)
Uh, why would that change refresh my physics on this?

Ursa (10:14)
Think of it this way, if the gravity effect is coming from the base moving perpendicular would take you away from that source. It’s like walking away from a magnet, the closer you get, the stronger the pull. But if you move sideways, the Pole should get weaker, we’re trying to see if that’s how this weird gravity thing is working.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (10:32)
Okay, I’m going to make a right hand turn here and see what happens.

Ursa (10:40)
All right, let’s see if that change in direction has any effect on the gravity readings.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (10:45)
Yeah, by making this right hand turn, I’ll effectively be making. It’s a 90° angle I’m going up. It’s perpendicular to it, so we’ll see if that changes anything?

Ursa (10:57)
All right, let’s see if that change in direction has any effect on the gravity readings.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (11:05)
Holding, give me a moment.

Ursa (11:09)
All right, take your time.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (11:13)
All right, so so far it seems like moving perpendicular. I’ve stayed within basically the same range, and so is the gravitational effect that’s holding steady.

Ursa (11:26)
All right, that’s interesting so it doesn’t seem like moving perpendicularly to the base makes a difference, let’s try something else. How about we move parallel to the base but further away?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (11:37)
All right, copy that.

Ursa (11:42)
All right, let’s see if that change in direction has any effect on the gravity readings.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (11:58)
Okay, uh, well nope, it’s actually not only is it, it seems to be getting stronger.

Ursa (12:09)
Alright, so it seems like the closer we get to the base, the stronger this gravitational effect gets, it’s almost like there’s some kind of massive object down there. It’s something that shouldn’t be there.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (12:21)
All right, well, uh, oh.

Ursa (12:26)
Uh, oh, what’s going on?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (12:30)
Uh, crowny seems to be going offline and I’ve suddenly stopped. I don’t have any more forward movement.

Ursa (12:41)
Alright, this is weird, let’s see if I can figure out what’s going on with crony. Can you check your battery levels and make sure everything’s plugged in correctly?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (12:51)
Battery levels are fine. They’re at 10 1 2 3 4 5 6, there are 80%.

Ursa (13:02)
All right, that’s good. Let’s see if we can get a visual on what’s going on. Can you describe what you’re seeing around you?

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (13:12)
It looks like the vehicle is surrounded by. These objects are getting closer.

Ursa (13:19)
All right, that doesn’t sound good. Can you try to speed up? Maybe we can outrun them.

Hakeem Ali-Bocas Alexander (13:25)
I can’t move it all, and I’m. I feel like I’m going to sleep.

Ursa (13:32)
All right, this doesn’t sound good. Let’s try to figure out what’s going on. Can you describe what’s happening to your vision, is it getting blurry? Just a reminder?